» Articles » PMID: 31613882

Transitions in Information Processing Dynamics at the Whole-brain Network Level Are Driven by Alterations in Neural Gain

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Oct 16
PMID 31613882
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A key component of the flexibility and complexity of the brain is its ability to dynamically adapt its functional network structure between integrated and segregated brain states depending on the demands of different cognitive tasks. Integrated states are prevalent when performing tasks of high complexity, such as maintaining items in working memory, consistent with models of a global workspace architecture. Recent work has suggested that the balance between integration and segregation is under the control of ascending neuromodulatory systems, such as the noradrenergic system, via changes in neural gain (in terms of the amplification and non-linearity in stimulus-response transfer function of brain regions). In a previous large-scale nonlinear oscillator model of neuronal network dynamics, we showed that manipulating neural gain parameters led to a 'critical' transition in phase synchrony that was associated with a shift from segregated to integrated topology, thus confirming our original prediction. In this study, we advance these results by demonstrating that the gain-mediated phase transition is characterized by a shift in the underlying dynamics of neural information processing. Specifically, the dynamics of the subcritical (segregated) regime are dominated by information storage, whereas the supercritical (integrated) regime is associated with increased information transfer (measured via transfer entropy). Operating near to the critical regime with respect to modulating neural gain parameters would thus appear to provide computational advantages, offering flexibility in the information processing that can be performed with only subtle changes in gain control. Our results thus link studies of whole-brain network topology and the ascending arousal system with information processing dynamics, and suggest that the constraints imposed by the ascending arousal system constrain low-dimensional modes of information processing within the brain.

Citing Articles

Structured Dynamics in the Algorithmic Agent.

Ruffini G, Castaldo F, Vohryzek J Entropy (Basel). 2025; 27(1).

PMID: 39851710 PMC: 11765005. DOI: 10.3390/e27010090.


Structural inequality and temporal brain dynamics across diverse samples.

Baez S, Hernandez H, Moguilner S, Cuadros J, Santamaria-Garcia H, Medel V Clin Transl Med. 2024; 14(10):e70032.

PMID: 39360669 PMC: 11447638. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70032.


The Profile of Network Spontaneous Activity and Functional Organization Interplay in Hierarchically Connected Modular Neural Networks In Vitro.

Pigareva Y, Gladkov A, Kolpakov V, Kazantsev V, Mukhina I, Pimashkin A Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38930702 PMC: 11205292. DOI: 10.3390/mi15060732.


The Constrained Disorder Principle May Account for Consciousness.

Sigawi T, Hamtzany O, Shakargy J, Ilan Y Brain Sci. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38539598 PMC: 10968910. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14030209.


Fractal basins as a mechanism for the nimble brain.

Bollt E, Fish J, Kumar A, Dos Santos E, Laurienti P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20860.

PMID: 38012212 PMC: 10682042. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45664-5.


References
1.
Ribeiro A, Kauffman S, Lloyd-Price J, Samuelsson B, Socolar J . Mutual information in random Boolean models of regulatory networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008; 77(1 Pt 1):011901. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.011901. View

2.
Stefanescu R, Jirsa V . Reduced representations of heterogeneous mixed neural networks with synaptic coupling. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011; 83(2 Pt 2):026204. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.026204. View

3.
Beggs J, Plenz D . Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(35):11167-77. PMC: 6741045. View

4.
Wibral M, Rahm B, Rieder M, Lindner M, Vicente R, Kaiser J . Transfer entropy in magnetoencephalographic data: quantifying information flow in cortical and cerebellar networks. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2010; 105(1-2):80-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.11.006. View

5.
Aburn M, Holmes C, Roberts J, Boonstra T, Breakspear M . Critical fluctuations in cortical models near instability. Front Physiol. 2012; 3:331. PMC: 3424523. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00331. View