» Articles » PMID: 31410461

EPIP: a Novel Approach for Condition-specific Enhancer-promoter Interaction Prediction

Overview
Journal Bioinformatics
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Aug 15
PMID 31410461
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Motivation: The identification of enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs), especially condition-specific ones, is important for the study of gene transcriptional regulation. Existing experimental approaches for EPI identification are still expensive, and available computational methods either do not consider or have low performance in predicting condition-specific EPIs.

Results: We developed a novel computational method called EPIP to reliably predict EPIs, especially condition-specific ones. EPIP is capable of predicting interactions in samples with limited data as well as in samples with abundant data. Tested on more than eight cell lines, EPIP reliably identifies EPIs, with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and an average area under the precision-recall curve of 0.73. Tested on condition-specific EPIPs, EPIP correctly identified 99.26% of them. Compared with two recently developed methods, EPIP outperforms them with a better accuracy.

Availability And Implementation: The EPIP tool is freely available at http://www.cs.ucf.edu/˜xiaoman/EPIP/.

Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Citing Articles

Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.

Wall B, Nguyen M, Harrell J, Dozmorov M Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2856:357-400.

PMID: 39283464 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4136-1_22.


Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization.

Wall B, Nguyen M, Harrell J, Dozmorov M ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38495565 PMC: 10942493.


A computational modeling of pri-miRNA expression.

Zheng H, Wang S, Li X, Hu H PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0290768.

PMID: 38165860 PMC: 10760784. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290768.


Integrative approaches based on genomic techniques in the functional studies on enhancers.

Wang Q, Zhang J, Liu Z, Duan Y, Li C Brief Bioinform. 2023; 25(1).

PMID: 38048082 PMC: 10694556. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad442.


A systematic study of HIF1A cofactors in hypoxic cancer cells.

Zhang Y, Wang S, Hu H, Li X Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18962.

PMID: 36347941 PMC: 9643333. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23060-9.


References
1.
de Laat W, Duboule D . Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature. 2013; 502(7472):499-506. DOI: 10.1038/nature12753. View

2.
Forcato M, Nicoletti C, Pal K, Livi C, Ferrari F, Bicciato S . Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(7):679-685. PMC: 5493985. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4325. View

3.
Whalen S, Truty R, Pollard K . Enhancer-promoter interactions are encoded by complex genomic signatures on looping chromatin. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(5):488-96. PMC: 4910881. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3539. View

4.
Rao S, Huntley M, Durand N, Stamenova E, Bochkov I, Robinson J . A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014; 159(7):1665-80. PMC: 5635824. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021. View

5.
Hoffman M, Buske O, Wang J, Weng Z, Bilmes J, Noble W . Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(5):473-6. PMC: 3340533. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1937. View