» Articles » PMID: 34573367

EPIsHilbert: Prediction of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Via Hilbert Curve Encoding and Transfer Learning

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34573367
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) play a significant role in the regulation of gene transcription. However, enhancers may not necessarily interact with the closest promoters, but with distant promoters via chromatin looping. Considering the spatial position relationship between enhancers and their target promoters is important for predicting EPIs. Most existing methods only consider sequence information regardless of spatial information. On the other hand, recent computational methods lack generalization capability across different cell line datasets. In this paper, we propose EPIsHilbert, which uses Hilbert curve encoding and two transfer learning approaches. Hilbert curve encoding can preserve the spatial position information between enhancers and promoters. Additionally, we use visualization techniques to explore important sequence fragments that have a high impact on EPIs and the spatial relationships between them. Transfer learning can improve prediction performance across cell lines. In order to further prove the effectiveness of transfer learning, we analyze the sequence coincidence of different cell lines. Experimental results demonstrate that EPIsHilbert is a state-of-the-art model that is superior to most of the existing methods both in specific cell lines and cross cell lines.

Citing Articles

Be-dataHIVE: a base editing database.

Schneider L, Minary P BMC Bioinformatics. 2024; 25(1):330.

PMID: 39407093 PMC: 11476525. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-024-05898-0.


Transfer Learning in Cancer Genetics, Mutation Detection, Gene Expression Analysis, and Syndrome Recognition.

Ashayeri H, Sobhi N, Plawiak P, Pedrammehr S, Alizadehsani R, Jafarizadeh A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893257 PMC: 11171544. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112138.


Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization.

Wall B, Nguyen M, Harrell J, Dozmorov M ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38495565 PMC: 10942493.


Predicting 3D chromatin interactions from DNA sequence using Deep Learning.

Piecyk R, Schlegel L, Johannes F Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022; 20:3439-3448.

PMID: 35832620 PMC: 9271978. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.047.

References
1.
Trask B . Fluorescence in situ hybridization: applications in cytogenetics and gene mapping. Trends Genet. 1991; 7(5):149-54. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90378-4. View

2.
Bernstein B, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Costello J, Ren B, Milosavljevic A, Meissner A . The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(10):1045-8. PMC: 3607281. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1010-1045. View

3.
Whalen S, Truty R, Pollard K . Enhancer-promoter interactions are encoded by complex genomic signatures on looping chromatin. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(5):488-96. PMC: 4910881. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3539. View

4.
Min X, Ye C, Liu X, Zeng X . Predicting enhancer-promoter interactions by deep learning and matching heuristic. Brief Bioinform. 2020; 22(4). DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa254. View

5.
Lenhard B, Sandelin A, Carninci P . Metazoan promoters: emerging characteristics and insights into transcriptional regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(4):233-45. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3163. View