» Articles » PMID: 31375586

Zika Virus Infection Induces DNA Damage Response in Human Neural Progenitors That Enhances Viral Replication

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection attenuates the growth of human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs). As these hNPCs generate the cortical neurons during early brain development, the ZIKV-mediated growth retardation potentially contributes to the neurodevelopmental defects of the congenital Zika syndrome. Here, we investigate the mechanism by which ZIKV manipulates the cell cycle in hNPCs and the functional consequence of cell cycle perturbation on the replication of ZIKV and related flaviviruses. We demonstrate that ZIKV, but not dengue virus (DENV), induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), triggering the DNA damage response through the ATM/Chk2 signaling pathway while suppressing the ATR/Chk1 signaling pathway. Furthermore, ZIKV infection impedes the progression of cells through S phase, thereby preventing the completion of host DNA replication. Recapitulation of the S-phase arrest state with inhibitors led to an increase in ZIKV replication, but not of West Nile virus or DENV. Our data identify ZIKV's ability to induce DSBs and suppress host DNA replication, which results in a cellular environment favorable for its replication. Clinically, Zika virus (ZIKV) infection can lead to developmental defects in the cortex of the fetal brain. How ZIKV triggers this event in developing neural cells is not well understood at a molecular level and likely requires many contributing factors. ZIKV efficiently infects human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs) and leads to growth arrest of these cells, which are critical for brain development. Here, we demonstrate that infection with ZIKV, but not dengue virus, disrupts the cell cycle of hNPCs by halting DNA replication during S phase and inducing DNA damage. We further show that ZIKV infection activates the ATM/Chk2 checkpoint but prevents the activation of another checkpoint, the ATR/Chk1 pathway. These results unravel an intriguing mechanism by which an RNA virus interrupts host DNA replication. Finally, by mimicking virus-induced S-phase arrest, we show that ZIKV manipulates the cell cycle to benefit viral replication.

Citing Articles

A human-specific, concerted repression of microcephaly genes contributes to radiation-induced growth defects in cortical organoids.

Ribeiro J, Etlioglu E, Buset J, Janssen A, Puype H, Berden L iScience. 2025; 28(2):111853.

PMID: 39967878 PMC: 11834077. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111853.


Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1 interacts with Zika virus NS5 and promotes viral replication in the infected cell.

Rodrigo I, Albentosa-Gonzalez L, Romero de Avila M, Bassi M, Sempere R, Clemente-Casares P J Gen Virol. 2025; 106(1.

PMID: 39773572 PMC: 11708914. DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.002063.


Follow-up brain MRI of infants with and without congenital Zika virus infection: paving the way for a thorough understanding of the consequences of Zika virus infection.

Rafful P, Teixeira S Radiol Bras. 2024; 57:e12.

PMID: 39687467 PMC: 11648858. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2024.57.e12.


Multi-protomics analysis identified host cellular pathways perturbed by tick-borne encephalitis virus infection.

Sui L, Wang W, Guo X, Zhao Y, Tian T, Zhang J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10435.

PMID: 39616195 PMC: 11608235. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54628-w.


Erp57 facilitates ZIKV-induced DNA damage via NS2B/NS3 complex formation.

Wang Y, Song D, Li Y, Qin L, Wan Q, Hu H Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024; 13(1):2417864.

PMID: 39404735 PMC: 11520102. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2417864.


References
1.
Weber A, Ryan A . ATM and ATR as therapeutic targets in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 149:124-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.12.001. View

2.
Paludan S, Bowie A . Immune sensing of DNA. Immunity. 2013; 38(5):870-80. PMC: 3683625. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.004. View

3.
Chanoux R, Yin B, Urtishak K, Asare A, Bassing C, Brown E . ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress. J Biol Chem. 2008; 284(9):5994-6003. PMC: 2645842. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M806739200. View

4.
Desany B, Alcasabas A, Bachant J, Elledge S . Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 1998; 12(18):2956-70. PMC: 317167. DOI: 10.1101/gad.12.18.2956. View

5.
Luftig M . Viruses and the DNA Damage Response: Activation and Antagonism. Annu Rev Virol. 2016; 1(1):605-25. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085548. View