» Articles » PMID: 31025365

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss Reduction with Platform-switching Components: 5-Year Post-loading Results of an Equivalence Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Date 2019 Apr 27
PMID 31025365
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare the clinical performance and marginal bone levels of implants restored with platform-switching (PS) or platform-matching (PM) abutments.

Materials And Methods: Adult patients missing two or more adjacent teeth in the posterior mandible received 2-4 CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants and were randomly allocated to the PM or PS group, receiving the corresponding prosthetic components from surgery onwards. Implants were conventionally loaded with single cemented crowns. Patients were followed annually for 5 years. Outcome measures were marginal bone level changes, implant survival, performance of the prosthetic components and clinical parameters plaque index, sulcus bleeding index and pocket probing depth.

Results: Thirty-three patients received 72 implants in the PM group, and thirty-five patients received 74 implants in the PS group. Sixty patients attended the final appointment, 31 had received PS components and 29 had received PM components with 65 and 63 implants, respectively. Global survival rate was 96.6% with no differences between groups (p = 0.647). After 5 years of functional loading, PS restored implants presented 0.23mm (95% CI: [0.03, 0.43], p = 0.025) lower marginal bone level changes. The two groups were declared non-equivalent.

Conclusion: Patients requiring implant supported restorations in healed bounded or free end edentulous gaps of the mandible benefit from the use of PS components in terms of peri-implant marginal bone level maintenance, though it may not be clinically noticeable.

Citing Articles

Clinical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Peri-Implant Parameters around Narrow Diameter Implant Crowns among Prediabetic and Non-Diabetic Subjects.

Alsahhaf A, Alali Y, Albeshri S, Subayt A, Alomayri A, Abduljabbar T Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(12).

PMID: 36557041 PMC: 9783321. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121839.


Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Changes around Dental Implants with Platform-Switched and Platform-Matched Abutments: A Retrospective 5-Year Radiographic Evaluation.

Lin H, Chin-Yi Lin J, Pan Y, Salamanca E, Chang Y, Hsu Y J Pers Med. 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36013175 PMC: 9409950. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081226.


Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1-1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants.

Maghsoudi P, Slot D, Van der Weijden F Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022; 8(3):680-689.

PMID: 35427440 PMC: 9209788. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.574.


Behavior of Soft Tissue around Platform-Switched Implants and Non-Platform-Switched Implants: A Comparative Three-Year Clinical Study.

Farronato D, Manfredini M, Farronato M, Pasini P, Orsina A, Lops D J Clin Med. 2021; 10(13).

PMID: 34209354 PMC: 8269426. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132955.


Clinical and radiographic performance of self-locking conical connection implants in the posterior mandible: Five-year results of a two-centre prospective study.

Moergel M, Rocha S, Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F, Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32(8):998-1007.

PMID: 34115893 PMC: 8457113. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13794.


References
1.
Mombelli A, van Oosten M, Schurch Jr E, Land N . The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987; 2(4):145-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. View

2.
Clementini M, Rossetti P, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela W, Canullo L . Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 43(3):323-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.012. View

3.
Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang N . Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of "platform switching": a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 23(1):90-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02196.x. View

4.
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T . Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20 Suppl 4:207-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x. View

5.
Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli M, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A . Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39(11):1097-113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01930.x. View