Clinical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Peri-Implant Parameters Around Narrow Diameter Implant Crowns Among Prediabetic and Non-Diabetic Subjects

Overview

Journal Medicina (Kaunas)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2022 Dec 23

PMID 36557041

Authors

Abdulaziz Alsahhaf

Yasser Alali

Sultan Albeshri

Abdulaziz K A Subayt

Abdullah Alomayri

Tariq Abduljabbar

Fahim Vohra

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

: To compare the clinical, radiographic, and inflammatory peri-implant parameters around narrow diameter implants (NDI) supported single and splinted crowns in non-diabetics and prediabetes. : The clinical and radiographic parameters and the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) of narrow diameter single (NDISCs) and splinted (NDISPs) crown implants were assessed both in non-diabetics and participants with prediabetes. The glycemic state of the patient was assessed using glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. The peri-implant soft tissue indices (Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), probing depth (PD)) and marginal bone loss were recorded and compared between the groups. Success of the prosthesis was assessed by the frequency of technical complications and patient satisfaction. Inter-group comparison was performed using ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) while the normal distribution of dependent variables was calculated using Shapiro-Wilk. A -value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. : Sixty participants (30 non-diabetics and 30 with prediabetes) with a total of 178 (118 NDISCs and 60 NDISPs) platform-switched NDIs were a part of the study. Of the 118 NDISCs, 56 were placed in the non-diabetic individuals and 62 were placed in the prediabetes group whereas 30 NDISPs each were placed in both the study groups. The clinical parameters of PI, BoP and PD in the single crown and splinted crown groups showed comparable results. However, a statistically significant difference (-value of less than 0.05) in PI, BoP and PD and in the values of IL-6 and TNF-α was found when a comparison was made between the non-diabetes and prediabetes group. A total of 91% of the patients were satisfied with the esthetics of the implants while 79% of the patients showed satisfaction with function. : All the clinical and radiographic parameters were statistically similar in both single and splinted types of narrow diameter implants. However, the bone loss, probing depth, plaque index, and levels of inflammatory markers were statistically higher in prediabetes as compared to non-diabetes implying that a slight hyperglycemic state impacts peri-implant health.

References

Messias A, Rocha S, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Moergel M, Behrens E . Peri-implant marginal bone loss reduction with platform-switching components: 5-Year post-loading results of an equivalence randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46(6):678-687. PMC: 6594132. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13119. View

Haghdoost A, Bakhshandeh S, Ghorbani Z, Namdari M . The Relationship between Oral and Dental Health Self-care and Hemoglobin A1c in Adults with Diabetes. J Dent (Shiraz). 2022; 23(1):33-39. PMC: 8918644. DOI: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87966.1300. View

Assaf A, Saad M, Hijawi S . Use of narrow-diameter implants in the posterior segments of the jaws: A retrospective observational study of 2 to 11 years. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 130(6):840-848. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.017. View

Ma M, Qi M, Zhang D, Liu H . The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2019; 45(6):503-508. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00025. View

Celik D, Kantarci A . Vascular Changes and Hypoxia in Periodontal Disease as a Link to Systemic Complications. Pathogens. 2021; 10(10). PMC: 8541389. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10101280. View

Lemos C, Verri F, Ferreira Santiago Junior J, de Souza Batista V, Kemmoku D, Noritomi P . Splinted and Nonsplinted Crowns with Different Implant Lengths in the Posterior Maxilla by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018:3163096. PMC: 6140271. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3163096. View

Lin I, Gonzalez A, Chang H, Kao S, Chen T . A 5-year follow-up of 80 implants in 44 patients placed immediately after the lateral trap-door window procedure to accomplish maxillary sinus elevation without bone grafting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(5):1079-86. View

Alrabiah M, Al Deeb M, Alsahhaf A, AlFawaz Y, Al-Aali K, Vohra F . Clinical and radiographic assessment of narrow-diameter and regular-diameter implants in the anterior and posterior jaw: 2 to 6 years of follow-up. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020; 50(2):97-105. PMC: 7192825. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2020.50.2.97. View

Al Amri M, Abduljabbar T, Al-Kheraif A, Romanos G, Javed F . Comparison of clinical and radiographic status around dental implants placed in patients with and without prediabetes: 1-year follow-up outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 28(2):231-235. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12788. View

10.

Patel V, Sadiq M, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar M, Heboyan A . Effects of metformin on the bioactivity and osseointegration of dental implants: A systematic review. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022; 18(1):196-206. PMC: 9643507. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.07.003. View

11.

Graves D, Ding Z, Yang Y . The impact of diabetes on periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2019; 82(1):214-224. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12318. View

12.

Mokeem S, Alfadda S, Al-Shibani N, Alrabiah M, Al-Hamdan R, Vohra F . Clinical and radiographic peri-implant variables around short dental implants in type 2 diabetic, prediabetic, and non-diabetic patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 21(1):60-65. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12691. View

13.

Al-Sowygh Z, Ab Ghani S, Sergis K, Vohra F, Akram Z . Peri-implant conditions and levels of advanced glycation end products among patients with different glycemic control. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20(3):345-351. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12584. View

14.

Hostalek U . Global epidemiology of prediabetes - present and future perspectives. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019; 5:5. PMC: 6507173. DOI: 10.1186/s40842-019-0080-0. View

15.

Belibasakis G, Manoil D . Microbial Community-Driven Etiopathogenesis of Peri-Implantitis. J Dent Res. 2020; 100(1):21-28. PMC: 7754824. DOI: 10.1177/0022034520949851. View

16.

Vigolo P, Mutinelli S, Zaccaria M, Stellini E . Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change around multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 10-year randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30(2):411-8. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3837. View

17.

Akram Z, Vohra F, Javed F . Locally delivered metformin as adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of periodontal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2018; 53(6):941-949. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12573. View

18.

Echouffo-Tcheugui J, Selvin E . Prediabetes and What It Means: The Epidemiological Evidence. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020; 42:59-77. PMC: 8026645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102644. View

19.

Menini M, Pesce P, Delucchi F, Ambrogio G, Canepa C, Carossa M . One-stage versus two-stage technique using two splinted extra-short implants: A multicentric split-mouth study with a one-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022; 24(5):602-610. PMC: 9796435. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13113. View

20.

Baskaran P, Prakash P, Appukuttan D, Mugri M, Sayed M, Subramanian S . Clinical and Radiological Outcomes for Guided Implant Placement in Sites Preserved with Bioactive Glass Bone Graft after Tooth Extraction: A Controlled Clinical Trial. Biomimetics (Basel). 2022; 7(2). PMC: 9036220. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7020043. View