» Articles » PMID: 31001816

Loss of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility and Minimal Fecundity Effects Explain Relatively Low Wolbachia Frequencies in Drosophila Mauritiana

Overview
Journal Evolution
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Apr 20
PMID 31001816
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maternally transmitted Wolbachia bacteria infect about half of all insect species. Many Wolbachia cause cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) and reduced egg hatch when uninfected females mate with infected males. Although CI produces a frequency-dependent fitness advantage that leads to high equilibrium Wolbachia frequencies, it does not aid Wolbachia spread from low frequencies. Indeed, the fitness advantages that produce initial Wolbachia spread and maintain non-CI Wolbachia remain elusive. wMau Wolbachia infecting Drosophila mauritiana do not cause CI, despite being very similar to CI-causing wNo from Drosophila simulans (0.068% sequence divergence over 682,494 bp), suggesting recent CI loss. Using draft wMau genomes, we identify a deletion in a CI-associated gene, consistent with theory predicting that selection within host lineages does not act to increase or maintain CI. In the laboratory, wMau shows near-perfect maternal transmission; but we find no significant effect on host fecundity, in contrast to published data. Intermediate wMau frequencies on the island of Mauritius are consistent with a balance between unidentified small, positive fitness effects and imperfect maternal transmission. Our phylogenomic analyses suggest that group-B Wolbachia, including wMau and wPip, diverged from group-A Wolbachia, such as wMel and wRi, 6-46 million years ago, more recently than previously estimated.

Citing Articles

Wolbachia enhances the survival of Drosophila infected with fungal pathogens.

Perlmutter J, Atadurdyyeva A, Schedl M, Unckless R BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):42.

PMID: 39934832 PMC: 11817339. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02130-0.


Double trouble: two retrotransposons triggered a cascade of invasions in Drosophila species within the last 50 years.

Scarpa A, Pianezza R, Gellert H, Haider A, Kim B, Lai E Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):516.

PMID: 39788974 PMC: 11718211. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55779-6.


Symbiotic Bacteria: Wolbachia, Midgut Microbiota in Mosquitoes and Their Importance for Vector Prevention Strategies.

Rajendran D, Vinayagam S, Sekar K, Bhowmick I, Sattu K Microb Ecol. 2024; 87(1):154.

PMID: 39681734 PMC: 11649735. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-024-02444-6.


Describing endosymbiont-host interactions within the parasitism-mutualism continuum.

Hoffmann A, Cooper B Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(7):e11705.

PMID: 38975267 PMC: 11224498. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11705.


Comparative analysis of Wolbachia maternal transmission and localization in host ovaries.

Hague M, Wheeler T, Cooper B Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):727.

PMID: 38877196 PMC: 11178894. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06431-y.


References
1.
Wu M, Sun L, Vamathevan J, Riegler M, DeBoy R, Brownlie J . Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: a streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(3):E69. PMC: 368164. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020069. View

2.
Yen J, Barr A . New hypothesis of the cause of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens L. Nature. 1971; 232(5313):657-8. DOI: 10.1038/232657a0. View

3.
Siozios S, Cestaro A, Kaur R, Pertot I, Rota-Stabelli O, Anfora G . Draft Genome Sequence of the Wolbachia Endosymbiont of Drosophila suzukii. Genome Announc. 2013; 1(1). PMC: 3587926. DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00032-13. View

4.
Turelli M . EVOLUTION OF INCOMPATIBILITY-INDUCING MICROBES AND THEIR HOSTS. Evolution. 2017; 48(5):1500-1513. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02192.x. View

5.
Hedges L, Brownlie J, ONeill S, Johnson K . Wolbachia and virus protection in insects. Science. 2008; 322(5902):702. DOI: 10.1126/science.1162418. View