» Articles » PMID: 36343219

Why -induced Cytoplasmic Incompatibility is So Common

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Nov 7
PMID 36343219
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common reproductive manipulation produced by , obligately intracellular alphaproteobacteria that infect approximately half of all insect species. Once infection frequencies within host populations approach 10%, intense CI can drive to near fixation within 10 generations. However, natural selection among variants within individual host populations does not favor enhanced CI. Indeed, variants that do not cause CI but increase host fitness or are more reliably maternally transmitted are expected to spread if infected females remain protected from CI. Nevertheless, approximately half of analyzed infections cause detectable CI. Why? The frequency and persistence of CI are more plausibly explained by preferential spread to new host species (clade selection) rather than by natural selection among variants within host populations. CI-causing lineages preferentially spread into new host species because 1) CI increases equilibrium frequencies within host populations, and 2) CI-causing variants can remain at high frequencies within populations even when conditions change so that initially beneficial infections become harmful. An epidemiological model describing acquisition and loss by host species and the loss of CI-induction within lineages yields simple expressions for the incidence of infections and the fraction of those infections causing CI. Supporting a determinative role for differential interspecific spread in maintaining CI, many infections were recently acquired by their host species, many show evidence for contemporary spatial spread or retreat, and rapid evolution of CI-inducing loci, especially degradation, is common.

Citing Articles

Development of the Incompatible Insect Technique targeting : introgression of a wild nuclear background restores the performance of males artificially infected with .

Lejarre Q, Scussel S, Esnault J, Gaudillat B, Duployer M, Mavingui P Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025; 91(2):e0235024.

PMID: 39840979 PMC: 11837521. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02350-24.


Wolbachia in Antarctic terrestrial invertebrates: Absent or undiscovered?.

Serga S, Kovalenko P, Maistrenko O, Deconninck G, Shevchenko O, Iakovenko N Environ Microbiol Rep. 2024; 16(6):e70040.

PMID: 39533947 PMC: 11558105. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.70040.


Spatially Varying Frequencies Reveal the Invasion Origin of an Agricultural Pest Recently Introduced From Europe to North America.

Lecic S, Wolfe T, Ghosh A, Satar S, Souza Beraldo C, Smith E Evol Appl. 2024; 17(9):e70016.

PMID: 39310793 PMC: 11413411. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70016.


Describing endosymbiont-host interactions within the parasitism-mutualism continuum.

Hoffmann A, Cooper B Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(7):e11705.

PMID: 38975267 PMC: 11224498. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11705.


Comparative analysis of Wolbachia maternal transmission and localization in host ovaries.

Hague M, Wheeler T, Cooper B Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):727.

PMID: 38877196 PMC: 11178894. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06431-y.


References
1.
Yen J, Barr A . New hypothesis of the cause of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens L. Nature. 1971; 232(5313):657-8. DOI: 10.1038/232657a0. View

2.
Kriesner P, Hoffmann A, Lee S, Turelli M, Weeks A . Rapid sequential spread of two Wolbachia variants in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9(9):e1003607. PMC: 3771877. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003607. View

3.
Turelli M, Hoffmann A . Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations. Genetics. 1995; 140(4):1319-38. PMC: 1206697. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1319. View

4.
Hoffmann A, Turelli M, Simmons G . UNIDIRECTIONAL INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA SIMULANS. Evolution. 2017; 40(4):692-701. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00531.x. View

5.
Pollmann M, Moore L, Krimmer E, DAlvise P, Hasselmann M, Perlman S . Highly transmissible cytoplasmic incompatibility by the extracellular insect symbiont . iScience. 2022; 25(5):104335. PMC: 9118660. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104335. View