Comparative Genomics of Wolbachia and the Bacterial Species Concept

Overview

Journal PLoS Genet

Specialty Genetics

Date 2013 Apr 18

PMID 23593012

Citations 99

Authors

Kirsten Maren Ellegaard

Lisa Klasson

Kristina Naslund

Kostas Bourtzis

Siv G E Andersson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The importance of host-specialization to speciation processes in obligate host-associated bacteria is well known, as is also the ability of recombination to generate cohesion in bacterial populations. However, whether divergent strains of highly recombining intracellular bacteria, such as Wolbachia, can maintain their genetic distinctness when infecting the same host is not known. We first developed a protocol for the genome sequencing of uncultivable endosymbionts. Using this method, we have sequenced the complete genomes of the Wolbachia strains wHa and wNo, which occur as natural double infections in Drosophila simulans populations on the Seychelles and in New Caledonia. Taxonomically, wHa belong to supergroup A and wNo to supergroup B. A comparative genomics study including additional strains supported the supergroup classification scheme and revealed 24 and 33 group-specific genes, putatively involved in host-adaptation processes. Recombination frequencies were high for strains of the same supergroup despite different host-preference patterns, leading to genomic cohesion. The inferred recombination fragments for strains of different supergroups were of short sizes, and the genomes of the co-infecting Wolbachia strains wHa and wNo were not more similar to each other and did not share more genes than other A- and B-group strains that infect different hosts. We conclude that Wolbachia strains of supergroup A and B represent genetically distinct clades, and that strains of different supergroups can co-exist in the same arthropod host without converging into the same species. This suggests that the supergroups are irreversibly separated and that barriers other than host-specialization are able to maintain distinct clades in recombining endosymbiont populations. Acquiring a good knowledge of the barriers to genetic exchange in Wolbachia will advance our understanding of how endosymbiont communities are constructed from vertically and horizontally transmitted genes.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of Wolbachia maternal transmission and localization in host ovaries.

Hague M, Wheeler T, Cooper B Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):727.

PMID: 38877196 PMC: 11178894. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06431-y.

Comparative analysis of maternal transmission and localization in host ovaries.

Hague M, Wheeler T, Cooper B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38496649 PMC: 10942406. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.03.583170.

Two sympatric lineages of Australian Cnestus solidus share Ambrosiella symbionts but not Wolbachia.

Bickerstaff J, Jordal B, Riegler M Heredity (Edinb). 2023; 132(1):43-53.

PMID: 37949964 PMC: 10798974. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-023-00659-w.

Complete De Novo Assembly of Endosymbiont of .

Zhang Z, Zhang J, Chen Q, He J, Li X, Wang Y Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).

PMID: 37686049 PMC: 10487741. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713245.

The Transmission Patterns of the Endosymbiont within the Hawaiian Drosophilidae Adaptive Radiation.

Corpuz R, Bellinger M, Veillet A, Magnacca K, Price D Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(8).

PMID: 37628597 PMC: 10454618. DOI: 10.3390/genes14081545.

References

Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy S . The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 30(1):276-80. PMC: 99071. DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.1.276. View

Mavingui P, Tran Van V, Labeyrie E, Rances E, Vavre F, Simonet P . Efficient procedure for purification of obligate intracellular Wolbachia pipientis and representative amplification of its genome by multiple-displacement amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(11):6910-7. PMC: 1287750. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6910-6917.2005. View

Brownlie J, Cass B, Riegler M, Witsenburg J, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, McGraw E . Evidence for metabolic provisioning by a common invertebrate endosymbiont, Wolbachia pipientis, during periods of nutritional stress. PLoS Pathog. 2009; 5(4):e1000368. PMC: 2657209. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000368. View

Cohan F . Bacterial species and speciation. Syst Biol. 2002; 50(4):513-24. DOI: 10.1080/10635150118398. View

Becraft E, Cohan F, Kuhl M, Jensen S, Ward D . Fine-scale distribution patterns of Synechococcus ecological diversity in microbial mats of Mushroom Spring, Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(21):7689-97. PMC: 3209189. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05927-11. View

Luo C, Walk S, Gordon D, Feldgarden M, Tiedje J, Konstantinidis K . Genome sequencing of environmental Escherichia coli expands understanding of the ecology and speciation of the model bacterial species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(17):7200-5. PMC: 3084108. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015622108. View

Li H, Durbin R . Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(14):1754-60. PMC: 2705234. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. View

Vos M, Didelot X . A comparison of homologous recombination rates in bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2008; 3(2):199-208. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2008.93. View

Baldo L, Bordenstein S, Wernegreen J, Werren J . Widespread recombination throughout Wolbachia genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 23(2):437-49. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj049. View

10.

Dean M, Ballard J . High divergence among Drosophila simulans mitochondrial haplogroups arose in midst of long term purifying selection. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005; 36(2):328-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.02.016. View

11.

James A, Dean M, McMahon M, Ballard J . Dynamics of double and single Wolbachia infections in Drosophila simulans from New Caledonia. Heredity (Edinb). 2002; 88(3):182-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800025. View

12.

Darby A, Armstrong S, Bah G, Kaur G, Hughes M, Kay S . Analysis of gene expression from the Wolbachia genome of a filarial nematode supports both metabolic and defensive roles within the symbiosis. Genome Res. 2012; 22(12):2467-77. PMC: 3514676. DOI: 10.1101/gr.138420.112. View

13.

Mira A, Martin-Cuadrado A, DAuria G, Rodriguez-Valera F . The bacterial pan-genome:a new paradigm in microbiology. Int Microbiol. 2010; 13(2):45-57. DOI: 10.2436/20.1501.01.110. View

14.

Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T . MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30(14):3059-66. PMC: 135756. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. View

15.

Lohse M, Bolger A, Nagel A, Fernie A, Lunn J, Stitt M . RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(Web Server issue):W622-7. PMC: 3394330. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks540. View

16.

Hanage W, Fraser C, Spratt B . Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria. BMC Biol. 2005; 3:6. PMC: 554772. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-3-6. View

17.

Weeks A, Turelli M, Harcombe W, Reynolds K, Hoffmann A . From parasite to mutualist: rapid evolution of Wolbachia in natural populations of Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(5):e114. PMC: 1852586. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050114. View

18.

Saridaki A, Bourtzis K . Wolbachia: more than just a bug in insects genitals. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009; 13(1):67-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.005. View

19.

Cohan F, Aracena S . Prokaryotic sex: eukaryote-like qualities of recombination in an Archaean lineage. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(15):R601-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.052. View

20.

Ballard J . Sequential evolution of a symbiont inferred from the host: Wolbachia and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 21(3):428-42. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh028. View