» Articles » PMID: 30963888

Dynamic Network Partnerships and Social Contagion Drive Cooperation

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30963888
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Both reciprocity and positive assortment (like with like) are predicted to promote the evolution of cooperation, yet how partners influence each other's behaviour within dynamic networks is not well understood. One way to test this question is to partition phenotypic variation into differences among individuals in the expression of cooperative behaviour (the 'direct effect'), and plasticity within individuals in response to the social environment (the 'indirect effect'). A positive correlation between these two sources of variation, such that more cooperative individuals elicit others to cooperate, is predicted to facilitate social contagion and selection on cooperative behaviour. Testing this hypothesis is challenging, however, because it requires repeated measures of behaviour across a dynamic social landscape. Here, we use an automated data-logging system to quantify the behaviour of 179 wire-tailed manakins, birds that form cooperative male-male coalitions, and we use multiple-membership models to test the hypothesis that dynamic network partnerships shape within-individual variation in cooperative behaviour. Our results show strong positive correlations between a bird's own sociality and his estimated effect on his partners, consistent with the hypothesis that cooperation begets cooperation. These findings support the hypothesis that social contagion can facilitate selection for cooperative behaviour within social networks.

Citing Articles

Full reconstruction of simplicial complexes from binary contagion and Ising data.

Wang H, Ma C, Chen H, Lai Y, Zhang H Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3043.

PMID: 35650211 PMC: 9160016. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30706-9.


Reciprocity and behavioral heterogeneity govern the stability of social networks.

Dakin R, Ryder T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(6):2993-2999.

PMID: 31980520 PMC: 7022202. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913284117.


Dynamic network partnerships and social contagion drive cooperation.

Dakin R, Ryder T Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 285(1893):20181973.

PMID: 30963888 PMC: 6304062. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1973.

References
1.
Soares M, Bshary R, Fusani L, Goymann W, Hau M, Hirschenhauser K . Hormonal mechanisms of cooperative behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1553):2737-50. PMC: 2936176. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0151. View

2.
Ryder T, Sillett T . Climate, demography and lek stability in an Amazonian bird. Proc Biol Sci. 2016; 283(1823). PMC: 4795018. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2314. View

3.
McDonald D . Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(26):10910-4. PMC: 1904119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701159104. View

4.
Formica V, Wood C, Larsen W, Butterfield R, Augat M, Hougen H . Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus). J Evol Biol. 2011; 25(1):130-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02411.x. View

5.
Ryder T, Horton B, van den Tillaart M, de Dios Morales J, Moore I . Proximity data-loggers increase the quantity and quality of social network data. Biol Lett. 2012; 8(6):917-20. PMC: 3497117. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0536. View