» Articles » PMID: 18381257

Social Networks in the Lek-mating Wire-tailed Manakin (Pipra Filicauda)

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Apr 3
PMID 18381257
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How social structure interacts with individual behaviour and fitness remains understudied despite its potential importance to the evolution of cooperation. Recent applications of network theory to social behaviour advance our understanding of the role of social interactions in various contexts. Here we applied network theory to the social system of lek-mating wire-tailed manakins (Pipra filicauda, Pipridae, Aves). We analysed the network of interactions among males in order to begin building a comparative framework to understand where coordinated display behaviour lies along the continuum from solitary to obligately cooperative dual-male displays in the family Pipridae. Network degree (the number of links from a male to others) ranged from 1 to 10, with low mean and high variance, consistent with the theory for the evolution of cooperation within social networks. We also assessed factors that could predict social and reproductive success of males. Four network metrics, degree, eigenvector centrality, information centrality and reach, some of which assess circuitous as well as the shortest (geodesic) paths of male connectivity, predicted male social rise. The duration of a male's territorial tenure during the 4 years of the study predicted his probability of siring offspring.

Citing Articles

Sexual conflict and social networks in bed bugs: effects of social experience.

Yan J, Rosenbaum J, Esteves S, Dobbin M, Dukas R Behav Ecol. 2024; 35(3):arae030.

PMID: 38690087 PMC: 11059254. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae030.


The impact of small groups on pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous populations.

McDonald G Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(5):e10057.

PMID: 37153025 PMC: 10154804. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10057.


Indirect genetic effects for social network structure in .

Wice E, Saltz J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1874):20220075.

PMID: 36802774 PMC: 9939268. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0075.


Group composition of individual personalities alters social network structure in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles.

Cook P, Baker O, Costello R, Formica V, Brodie 3rd E Biol Lett. 2022; 18(3):20210509.

PMID: 35291883 PMC: 8923822. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0509.


Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.

Jezovit J, Alwash N, Levine J Front Neural Circuits. 2021; 15:755093.

PMID: 34924963 PMC: 8683092. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2021.755093.


References
1.
Croft D, Krause J, James R . Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 271 Suppl 6:S516-9. PMC: 1810091. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0206. View

2.
Lusseau D, Newman M . Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 271 Suppl 6:S477-81. PMC: 1810112. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0225. View

3.
Santos F, Pacheco J . A new route to the evolution of cooperation. J Evol Biol. 2006; 19(3):726-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01063.x. View

4.
McDonald D, Potts W . Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science. 1994; 266(5187):1030-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.7973654. View

5.
McDonald D . Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(26):10910-4. PMC: 1904119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701159104. View