» Articles » PMID: 29104749

A Guide to Null Models for Animal Social Network Analysis

Overview
Date 2017 Nov 7
PMID 29104749
Citations 115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Null models are an important component of the social network analysis toolbox. However, their use in hypothesis testing is still not widespread. Furthermore, several different approaches for constructing null models exist, each with their relative strengths and weaknesses, and often testing different hypotheses.In this study, I highlight why null models are important for robust hypothesis testing in studies of animal social networks. Using simulated data containing a known observation bias, I test how different statistical tests and null models perform if such a bias was unknown.I show that permutations of the raw observational (or 'pre-network') data consistently account for underlying structure in the generated social network, and thus can reduce both type I and type II error rates. However, permutations of pre-network data remain relatively uncommon in animal social network analysis because they are challenging to implement for certain data types, particularly those from focal follows and GPS tracking.I explain simple routines that can easily be implemented across different types of data, and supply R code that applies each type of null model to the same simulated dataset. The R code can easily be modified to test hypotheses with empirical data. Widespread use of pre-network data permutation methods will benefit researchers by facilitating robust hypothesis testing.

Citing Articles

Animal social networks are robust to changing association definitions.

Chan A, Dunning J, Beck K, Burke T, Chik H, Dunleavy D Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2025; 79(2):26.

PMID: 39927187 PMC: 11802709. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7.


Centrality of Hygienic Honey Bee Workers in Colony Social Networks.

Perez A, Johnson B Insects. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39859639 PMC: 11766216. DOI: 10.3390/insects16010058.


The extent of western lowland gorilla social relationships within and between groups.

Cooksey K, Funkhouser J, Sanz C, Marie Massamba J, Fabrice Ebombi T, Teberd P PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316598.

PMID: 39854343 PMC: 11761170. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316598.


Selective social tolerance drives differentiated relationships among wild female chimpanzees.

Fox S, Muller M, Pena N, Thompson Gonzalez N, Machanda Z, Otali E Anim Behav. 2025; 217():21-38.

PMID: 39830151 PMC: 11741668. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.08.008.


Social Relationships of Captive Bachelor Przewalski's Horses and Their Effect on Daily Activity and Space Use.

Nykonenko A, Moturnak Y, McLoughlin P Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39794996 PMC: 11718881. DOI: 10.3390/ani15010053.


References
1.
Boogert N, Farine D, Spencer K . Developmental stress predicts social network position. Biol Lett. 2014; 10(10):20140561. PMC: 4272205. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0561. View

2.
Bejder , Fletcher , BrAger . A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(3):719-725. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0802. View

3.
Ilany A, Booms A, Holekamp K . Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal. Ecol Lett. 2015; 18(7):687-95. PMC: 4486283. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12447. View

4.
Aplin L, Firth J, Farine D, Voelkl B, Crates R, Culina A . Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, . Anim Behav. 2015; 108:117-127. PMC: 4579410. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.016. View

5.
Aplin L, Farine D, Morand-Ferron J, Cole E, Cockburn A, Sheldon B . Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(11):1365-72. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12181. View