Deep Learning-based Image Restoration Algorithm for Coronary CT Angiography

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2019 Apr 10

PMID 30963270

Citations 86

Authors

Fuminari Tatsugami

Toru Higaki

Yuko Nakamura

Zhou Yu

Jian Zhou

Yujie Lu

Chikako Fujioka

Toshiro Kitagawa

Yasuki Kihara

Makoto Iida

Kazuo Awai

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) subjected to deep learning-based image restoration (DLR) method with images subjected to hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

Methods: We enrolled 30 patients (22 men, 8 women) who underwent coronary CTA on a 320-slice CT scanner. The images were reconstructed with hybrid IR and with DLR. The image noise in the ascending aorta, left atrium, and septal wall of the ventricle was measured on all images and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the proximal coronary arteries was calculated. We also generated CT attenuation profiles across the proximal coronary arteries and measured the width of the edge rise distance (ERD) and the edge rise slope (ERS). Two observers visually evaluated the overall image quality using a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent).

Results: On DLR images, the mean image noise was lower than that on hybrid IR images (18.5 ± 2.8 HU vs. 23.0 ± 4.6 HU, p < 0.01) and the CNR was significantly higher (p < 0.01). The mean ERD was significantly shorter on DLR than on hybrid IR images, whereas the mean ERS was steeper on DLR than on hybrid IR images. The mean image quality score for hybrid IR and DLR images was 2.96 and 3.58, respectively (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: DLR reduces the image noise and improves the image quality at coronary CTA.

Key Points: • Deep learning-based image restoration is a new technique that employs the deep convolutional neural network for image quality improvement. • Deep learning-based restoration reduces the image noise and improves image quality at coronary CT angiography. • This method may allow for a reduction in radiation exposure.

Citing Articles

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction for improved quality of myocardial CT late enhancement.

Takafuji M, Kitagawa K, Mizutani S, Hamaguchi A, Kisou R, Sasaki K Jpn J Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40072715 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-025-01760-2.

CZT-based photon-counting-detector CT with deep-learning reconstruction: image quality and diagnostic confidence for lung tumor assessment.

Sasaki T, Kuno H, Nomura K, Muramatsu Y, Aokage K, Samejima J Jpn J Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40053285 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-025-01759-9.

Diagnostic value of deep learning reconstruction-based subtraction CT-FFR in patients with calcified-related stenosis or stent implantation.

Xu C, Yi Y, Xu M, Zou L, Wang M, Wang Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(2):1599-1612.

PMID: 39995698 PMC: 11847182. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1366.

From imaging to computational domains for physics-driven molecular biology simulations: Hindered diffusion in platelet masses.

House C, Huang Z, Shankar K, Young S, Roberts M, Diamond S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975354 PMC: 11839050. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.06.636817.

High-resolution deep learning reconstruction for coronary CTA: compared efficacy of stenosis evaluation with other methods at in vitro and in vivo studies.

Matsuyama T, Nagata H, Ozawa Y, Ito Y, Kimata H, Fujii K Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39903239 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11376-9.

References

Birnbaum B, Hindman N, Lee J, Babb J . Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology. 2006; 242(1):109-19. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2421052066. View

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber T . Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009; 301(5):500-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.54. View

Dreyer K, Geis J . When Machines Think: Radiology's Next Frontier. Radiology. 2017; 285(3):713-718. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017171183. View

Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, Fukumoto W, Kaichi Y, Iida M . Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction at Coronary CT Angiography. Acad Radiol. 2017; 24(8):975-981. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.020. View

Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog B, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O . Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(3):635-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1390. View

Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liao P, Li K, Zhou J . Low-dose CT via convolutional neural network. Biomed Opt Express. 2017; 8(2):679-694. PMC: 5330597. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.8.000679. View

Lembcke A, Wiese T, Schnorr J, Wagner S, Mews J, Kroencke T . Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography: intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Invest Radiol. 2004; 39(6):357-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000123316.10765.6c. View

Anthimopoulos M, Christodoulidis S, Ebner L, Christe A, Mougiakakou S . Lung Pattern Classification for Interstitial Lung Diseases Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 35(5):1207-1216. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2535865. View

Yoshida H, Nappi J . CAD in CT colonography without and with oral contrast agents: progress and challenges. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007; 31(4-5):267-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.011. View

10.

Kahn Jr C . From Images to Actions: Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. Radiology. 2017; 285(3):719-720. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017171734. View

11.

Herzog C, Zwerner P, Doll J, Nielsen C, Nguyen S, Savino G . Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007; 244(1):112-20. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441060332. View

12.

Becker A, Marcon M, Ghafoor S, Wurnig M, Frauenfelder T, Boss A . Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer. Invest Radiol. 2017; 52(7):434-440. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000358. View

13.

Raff G, Gallagher M, ONeill W, Goldstein J . Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(3):552-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056. View

14.

Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger B, Leber A, Johnson T . Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(1):111-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1697. View

15.

Geyer L, Schoepf U, Meinel F, Nance Jr J, Bastarrika G, Leipsic J . State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. Radiology. 2015; 276(2):339-57. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015132766. View

16.

Yang Q, Yan P, Zhang Y, Yu H, Shi Y, Mou X . Low-Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network With Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Loss. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018; 37(6):1348-1357. PMC: 6021013. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2827462. View

17.

Bauer S, Wiest R, Nolte L, Reyes M . A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies. Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(13):R97-129. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/R97. View

18.

Yokomachi K, Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Kume S, Sakamoto S, Okazaki T . Neointimal formation after carotid artery stenting: phantom and clinical evaluation of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(1):161-167. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5598-5. View

19.

Suzuki S, Machida H, Tanaka I, Ueno E . Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(3):652-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8689. View

20.

Nelson R, Feuerlein S, Boll D . New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages?. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5(5):286-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.07.001. View