» Articles » PMID: 30873042

Searching for Face-Category Representation in the Avian Visual Forebrain

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2019 Mar 16
PMID 30873042
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual information is processed hierarchically along a ventral ('what') pathway that terminates with categorical representation of biologically relevant visual percepts (such as faces) in the mammalian extrastriate visual cortex. How birds solve face and object representation without a neocortex is a long-standing problem in evolutionary neuroscience, though multiple lines of evidence suggest that these abilities arise from circuitry fundamentally similar to the extrastriate visual cortex. The aim of the present experiment was to determine whether birds also exhibit a categorical representation of the avian face-region in four visual forebrain structures of the tectofugal visual pathway: entopallium (ENTO), mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL), nidopallium frontolaterale (NFL), and area temporo-parieto-occipitalis (TPO). We performed electrophysiological recordings from the right and left hemispheres of 13 pigeons while they performed a Go/No-Go task that required them to discriminate between two sets of stimuli that included images of pigeon faces. No neurons fired selectively to only faces in either ENTO, NFL, MVL, or TPO. Birds' predisposition to attend to the local-features of stimuli may influence the perception of faces as a global combination of features, and explain our observed absence of face-selective neurons. The implementation of naturalistic viewing paradigms in conjunction with electrophysiological and fMRI techniques has the potential to promote and uncover the global processing of visual objects to determine whether birds exhibit category-selective patches in the tectofugal visual forebrain.

Citing Articles

Innate face-selectivity in the brain of young domestic chicks.

Kobylkov D, Rosa-Salva O, Zanon M, Vallortigara G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(40):e2410404121.

PMID: 39316055 PMC: 11459190. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410404121.


Eagle eyed or bird brained?.

Williams D Eye (Lond). 2023; 37(12):2426-2430.

PMID: 37353509 PMC: 10397276. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02568-y.


'Do I know you?' Categorizing individuals on the basis of familiarity in kea ().

Suwandschieff E, Mundry R, Kull K, Kreuzer L, Schwing R R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(6):230228.

PMID: 37351495 PMC: 10282571. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230228.


Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images.

Clark W, Chilcott M, Azizi A, Pusch R, Perry K, Colombo M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):589.

PMID: 35022466 PMC: 8755821. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04559-z.


Non-visual Opsins and Novel Photo-Detectors in the Vertebrate Inner Retina Mediate Light Responses Within the Blue Spectrum Region.

Guido M, Marchese N, Rios M, Morera L, Diaz N, Garbarino-Pico E Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2020; 42(1):59-83.

PMID: 33231827 PMC: 11441211. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-020-00997-x.

References
1.
Husband S, Shimizu T . Efferent projections of the ectostriatum in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Neurol. 1999; 406(3):329-45. View

2.
Shimizu T, Bowers A . Visual circuits of the avian telencephalon: evolutionary implications. Behav Brain Res. 2000; 98(2):183-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00083-7. View

3.
Cavoto K, Cook R . Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001; 27(1):3-16. View

4.
Bilkey D, Russell N, Colombo M . A lightweight microdrive for single-unit recording in freely moving rats and pigeons. Methods. 2003; 30(2):152-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1046-2023(03)00076-8. View

5.
Tsao D, Freiwald W, Knutsen T, Mandeville J, Tootell R . Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(9):989-95. PMC: 8117179. DOI: 10.1038/nn1111. View