» Articles » PMID: 19109916

Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey

Overview
Journal Neuron
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Dec 27
PMID 19109916
Citations 550
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inferior temporal (IT) object representations have been intensively studied in monkeys and humans, but representations of the same particular objects have never been compared between the species. Moreover, IT's role in categorization is not well understood. Here, we presented monkeys and humans with the same images of real-world objects and measured the IT response pattern elicited by each image. In order to relate the representations between the species and to computational models, we compare response-pattern dissimilarity matrices. IT response patterns form category clusters, which match between man and monkey. The clusters correspond to animate and inanimate objects; within the animate objects, faces and bodies form subclusters. Within each category, IT distinguishes individual exemplars, and the within-category exemplar similarities also match between the species. Our findings suggest that primate IT across species may host a common code, which combines a categorical and a continuous representation of objects.

Citing Articles

Noradrenergic and Dopaminergic modulation of meta-cognition and meta-control.

Ershadmanesh S, Rajabi S, Rostami R, Moran R, Dayan P PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(2):e1012675.

PMID: 40009609 PMC: 11903042. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012675.


Perceptual and semantic maps in individual humans share structural features that predict creative abilities.

Seiler J, Elpelt J, Ghobadi A, Kaschube M, Rumpel S Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):30.

PMID: 39994417 PMC: 11850602. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00214-9.


Visual homogeneity computations in the brain enable solving property-based visual tasks.

Jacob G, Pramod R, Arun S Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39964738 PMC: 11835389. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.93033.


Differences in category information processing between areas TEO and TE of the macaque.

Shimizu M, Katakami S, Okada M, Sugase-Miyamoto Y, Hayashi K, Matsuda K Front Behav Neurosci. 2025; 18:1449097.

PMID: 39944510 PMC: 11814174. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1449097.


Neural representation of sensorimotor features in language-motor areas during auditory and visual perception.

Zheng Y, Zhang J, Yang Y, Xu M Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):41.

PMID: 39799186 PMC: 11724955. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07466-5.


References
1.
Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N . The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 2001; 41(10-11):1409-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00073-6. View

2.
Pruessmann K . Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 15(4):237-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000139297.66742.4e. View

3.
Aguirre G, Zarahn E, DEsposito M . An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to "building" stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron. 1998; 21(2):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80546-2. View

4.
Sigala N, Logothetis N . Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature. 2002; 415(6869):318-20. DOI: 10.1038/415318a. View

5.
Op de Beeck H, Wagemans J, Vogels R . Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(12):1244-52. DOI: 10.1038/nn767. View