» Articles » PMID: 19104670

Representational Similarity Analysis - Connecting the Branches of Systems Neuroscience

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Dec 24
PMID 19104670
Citations 1293
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGE FOR SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE IS TO QUANTITATIVELY RELATE ITS THREE MAJOR BRANCHES OF RESEARCH: brain-activity measurement, behavioral measurement, and computational modeling. Using measured brain-activity patterns to evaluate computational network models is complicated by the need to define the correspondency between the units of the model and the channels of the brain-activity data, e.g., single-cell recordings or voxels from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Similar correspondency problems complicate relating activity patterns between different modalities of brain-activity measurement (e.g., fMRI and invasive or scalp electrophysiology), and between subjects and species. In order to bridge these divides, we suggest abstracting from the activity patterns themselves and computing representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs), which characterize the information carried by a given representation in a brain or model. Building on a rich psychological and mathematical literature on similarity analysis, we propose a new experimental and data-analytical framework called representational similarity analysis (RSA), in which multi-channel measures of neural activity are quantitatively related to each other and to computational theory and behavior by comparing RDMs. We demonstrate RSA by relating representations of visual objects as measured with fMRI in early visual cortex and the fusiform face area to computational models spanning a wide range of complexities. The RDMs are simultaneously related via second-level application of multidimensional scaling and tested using randomization and bootstrap techniques. We discuss the broad potential of RSA, including novel approaches to experimental design, and argue that these ideas, which have deep roots in psychology and neuroscience, will allow the integrated quantitative analysis of data from all three branches, thus contributing to a more unified systems neuroscience.

Citing Articles

The conceptual structure of human relationships across modern and historical cultures.

Cheng X, Popal H, Wang H, Hu R, Zang Y, Zhang M Nat Hum Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 40082684 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02122-8.


Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD.

Gao Z, Duberg K, Warren S, Zheng L, Hinshaw S, Menon V Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2346.

PMID: 40057478 PMC: 11890578. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57685-x.


Shared neural dynamics of facial expression processing.

Ely M, Ambrus G Cogn Neurodyn. 2025; 19(1):45.

PMID: 40046006 PMC: 11880506. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-025-10230-4.


Distinct neural representations of different linguistic components following sign language learning.

Coldham Y, Haluts N, Elbaz E, Ben-David T, Racabi N, Gal S Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):353.

PMID: 40033011 PMC: 11876632. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07793-7.


Decoding the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Neural Response Similarity in Auditory Processing: A Multivariate Analysis Based on OPM-MEG.

Liu C, Ma Y, Liang X, Xiang M, Wu H, Ning X Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(4):e70175.

PMID: 40016919 PMC: 11868016. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70175.


References
1.
Duong T, Kim D, Ugurbil K, Kim S . Localized cerebral blood flow response at submillimeter columnar resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(19):10904-9. PMC: 58572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191101098. View

2.
Fischl B, Sereno M, Tootell R, Dale A . High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000; 8(4):272-84. PMC: 6873338. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::aid-hbm10>3.0.co;2-4. View

3.
Worsley K, Evans A, Marrett S, Neelin P . A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992; 12(6):900-18. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1992.127. View

4.
Haxby J, Gobbini M, Furey M, Ishai A, SCHOUTEN J, Pietrini P . Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science. 2001; 293(5539):2425-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.1063736. View

5.
Goebel R, Esposito F, Formisano E . Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006; 27(5):392-401. PMC: 6871277. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20249. View