» Articles » PMID: 30771217

Radiation Dose in Nuclear Medicine: the Hybrid Imaging

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Feb 17
PMID 30771217
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hybrid imaging procedures such as single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed a rapid diffusion in recent years because of their high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, due to a more accurate localization and definition of scintigraphic findings. However, hybrid systems inevitably lead to an increase in patient radiation exposure because of the added CT component. Effective doses due to the radiopharmaceuticals can be estimated by multiplying the administered activities by the effective dose coefficients, while for the CT component the dose-length product can be multiplied by a conversion coefficient k. However, the effective dose value is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and must be interpreted as a broad, generic estimate of biologic risk. Although the effective dose can be used to estimate and compare the risk of radiation exposure across multiple imaging techniques, clinicians should be aware that it represents a generic evaluation of the risk derived from a given procedure to a generic model of the human body. It cannot be applied to a single individual and should not be used for epidemiologic studies or the estimation of population risks due to the inherent uncertainties and oversimplifications involved. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose to patients eligible for hybrid imaging involve adjustments to both the planning phase and throughout the execution of the study. These methods include individual justification of radiation exposure, radiopharmaceutical choice, adherence to diagnostic reference levels (DLR), patient hydration and bladder voiding, adoption of new technical devices (sensitive detectors or collimators) with new reconstruction algorithms, and implementation of appropriate CT protocols and exposure parameters.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in positron emission tomography for detecting early fibrosis after myocardial infarction.

Wu Q, Song J, Liu W, Li L, Li S Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1479777.

PMID: 39529975 PMC: 11552091. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1479777.


Comparative Performance of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Primary Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy.

Rovera G, Grimaldi S, Oderda M, Marra G, Calleris G, Iorio G Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272748 PMC: 11394562. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171964.


Association of epicardial fat volume with subclinical myocardial damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Hu Y, Yu W, Zhang F, Wang Y, Wang J, Wan P Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(3):2627-2639.

PMID: 38545037 PMC: 10963843. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1413.


Comparison of Digital versus Analog Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Performance in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence after Radical Treatment.

Rovera G, Grimaldi S, DallArmellina S, Zotta M, Finessi M, Passera R Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38066776 PMC: 10706683. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13233535.


The prognostic role of next-generation imaging-driven upstaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Bauckneht M, Checcucci E, Cisero E, Rizzo A, Racca M, De Cillis S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 51(3):864-870.

PMID: 37935995 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06490-z.


References
1.
Roach P, Schembri G, Ho Shon I, Bailey E, Bailey D . SPECT/CT imaging using a spiral CT scanner for anatomical localization: Impact on diagnostic accuracy and reporter confidence in clinical practice. Nucl Med Commun. 2006; 27(12):977-87. DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000243372.26507.e7. View

2.
Martin C . Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?. Br J Radiol. 2007; 80(956):639-47. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/25922439. View

3.
. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. View

4.
Sawyer L, Starritt H, Hiscock S, Evans M . Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods. Nucl Med Commun. 2007; 29(2):144-9. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f258ef. View

5.
Mettler Jr F, Huda W, Yoshizumi T, Mahesh M . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248(1):254-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451. View