Funashima K, Abiko S, Sato K
Radiol Phys Technol. 2023; 16(4):506-515.
PMID: 37648948
DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00738-x.
Tabari A, Li X, Yang K, Liu B, Gee M, Westra S
Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 51(13):2498-2506.
PMID: 34532817
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05160-2.
Hamard A, Greffier J, Bastide S, Larbi A, Addala T, Sadate A
Eur Radiol. 2020; 31(4):2621-2633.
PMID: 33034747
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07304-8.
Salvatori M, Rizzo A, Rovera G, Indovina L, Schillaci O
Radiol Med. 2019; 124(8):768-776.
PMID: 30771217
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-00989-y.
Kobayashi M, Asada Y, Matsubara K, Suzuki S, Koshida K, Matsunaga Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016; 17(4):342-356.
PMID: 27455500
PMC: 5690042.
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218.
Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates.
Quinn B, Dauer Z, Pandit-Taskar N, Schoder H, Dauer L
BMC Med Imaging. 2016; 16(1):41.
PMID: 27317478
PMC: 4912712.
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0143-y.
Illegal intra-corporeal packets: can dual energy CT be used for the evaluation of cocaine concentration? A cross sectional study.
Platon A, Becker M, Becker C, Lock E, Wolff H, Perneger T
BMC Med Imaging. 2016; 16:3.
PMID: 26762344
PMC: 4712503.
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0106-3.
Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.
Shrimpton P, Jansen J, Harrison J
Br J Radiol. 2015; 89(1057):20150346.
PMID: 26544160
PMC: 4985946.
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150346.
Influence of image acquisition on radiation dose and image quality: full versus narrow phase window acquisition using 320 MDCT.
Khosa F, Khan A, Nasir K, Shuaib W, Budoff M, Blankstein R
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2013:731590.
PMID: 24453899
PMC: 3884853.
DOI: 10.1155/2013/731590.
Preliminary study of prospective ECG-gated 320-detector CT coronary angiography in patients with ventricular premature beats.
Zhang T, Bai J, Wang W, Wang D, Shen B
PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38430.
PMID: 22701639
PMC: 3368870.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038430.
Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography.
Khan A, Khosa F, Nasir K, Yassin A, Clouse M
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(1):163-8.
PMID: 21701026
PMC: 3294285.
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5250.
Prospective gating with 320-MDCT angiography: effect of volume scan length on radiation dose.
Khan A, Nasir K, Khosa F, Saghir A, Sarwar S, Clouse M
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(2):407-11.
PMID: 21257894
PMC: 3294289.
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4903.
Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.
Nikolic B, Khosa F, Lin P, Khan A, Sarwar S, Yam C
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(6):1347-54.
PMID: 21098194
PMC: 3289940.
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4333.
A pediatric CT dose and risk estimator.
Alessio A, Phillips G
Pediatr Radiol. 2010; 40(11):1816-21.
PMID: 20623277
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-010-1761-0.
Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.
Einstein A, Elliston C, Arai A, Chen M, Mather R, Pearson G
Radiology. 2010; 254(3):698-706.
PMID: 20177085
PMC: 2826696.
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090779.
Radiation dose and safety in cardiac computed tomography.
Gerber T, Kantor B, McCollough C
Cardiol Clin. 2009; 27(4):665-77.
PMID: 19766923
PMC: 2749002.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.06.006.
