» Articles » PMID: 30700811

Genome-wide Association Study of Antidepressant Treatment Resistance in a Population-based Cohort Using Health Service Prescription Data and Meta-analysis with GENDEP

Abstract

Antidepressants demonstrate modest response rates in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Despite previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of antidepressant treatment response, the underlying genetic factors are unknown. Using prescription data in a population and family-based cohort (Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study; GS:SFHS), we sought to define a measure of (a) antidepressant treatment resistance and (b) stages of antidepressant resistance by inferring antidepressant switching as non-response to treatment. GWAS were conducted separately for antidepressant treatment resistance in GS:SFHS and the Genome-based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP) study and then meta-analysed (meta-analysis n = 4213, cases = 358). For stages of antidepressant resistance, a GWAS on GS:SFHS only was performed (n = 3452). Additionally, we conducted gene-set enrichment, polygenic risk scoring (PRS) and genetic correlation analysis. We did not identify any significant loci, genes or gene sets associated with antidepressant treatment resistance or stages of resistance. Significant positive genetic correlations of antidepressant treatment resistance and stages of resistance with neuroticism, psychological distress, schizotypy and mood disorder traits were identified. These findings suggest that larger sample sizes are needed to identify the genetic architecture of antidepressant treatment response, and that population-based observational studies may provide a tractable approach to achieving the necessary statistical power.

Citing Articles

Genetic Correlates of Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Xu B, Forthman K, Kuplicki R, Ahern J, Loughnan R, Naber F JAMA Psychiatry. 2025; .

PMID: 40009368 PMC: 11866074. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4825.


Treatment-resistant depression: role of genetic factors in the perspective of clinical stratification and treatment personalisation.

Fabbri C Mol Psychiatry. 2025; .

PMID: 39827221 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-025-02899-0.


Genome-wide meta-analyses of non-response to antidepressants identify novel loci and potential drugs.

Koch E, Jurgenson T, Einarsson G, Mitchell B, Harder A, Garcia-Marin L Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39764137 PMC: 11703334. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5418279/v1.


Endophenotype 2.0: updated definitions and criteria for endophenotypes of psychiatric disorders, incorporating new technologies and findings.

Liu C, Gershon E Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):502.

PMID: 39719446 PMC: 11668880. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03195-1.


Genetic determinants of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug response.

Stassen H, Bachmann S, Bridler R, Cattapan K, Hartmann A, Rujescu D Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024; .

PMID: 39379546 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-024-01918-5.


References
1.
Iniesta R, Malki K, Maier W, Rietschel M, Mors O, Hauser J . Combining clinical variables to optimize prediction of antidepressant treatment outcomes. J Psychiatr Res. 2016; 78:94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.03.016. View

2.
Wang W, Grimmer J, van de Water T, Lufkin T . Hmx2 and Hmx3 homeobox genes direct development of the murine inner ear and hypothalamus and can be functionally replaced by Drosophila Hmx. Dev Cell. 2004; 7(3):439-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.016. View

3.
Nagy R, Boutin T, Marten J, Huffman J, Kerr S, Campbell A . Exploration of haplotype research consortium imputation for genome-wide association studies in 20,032 Generation Scotland participants. Genome Med. 2017; 9(1):23. PMC: 5339960. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-017-0414-4. View

4.
Ustun T, Ayuso-Mateos J, Chatterji S, Mathers C, Murray C . Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry. 2004; 184:386-92. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.184.5.386. View

5.
Ruhe H, van Rooijen G, Spijker J, Peeters F, Schene A . Staging methods for treatment resistant depression. A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2011; 137(1-3):35-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.020. View