» Articles » PMID: 34002503

The Promise of Machine Learning in Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Psychiatry

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 May 18
PMID 34002503
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For many years, psychiatrists have tried to understand factors involved in response to medications or psychotherapies, in order to personalize their treatment choices. There is now a broad and growing interest in the idea that we can develop models to personalize treatment decisions using new statistical approaches from the field of machine learning and applying them to larger volumes of data. In this pursuit, there has been a paradigm shift away from experimental studies to confirm or refute specific hypotheses towards a focus on the overall explanatory power of a predictive model when tested on new, unseen datasets. In this paper, we review key studies using machine learning to predict treatment outcomes in psychiatry, ranging from medications and psychotherapies to digital interventions and neurobiological treatments. Next, we focus on some new sources of data that are being used for the development of predictive models based on machine learning, such as electronic health records, smartphone and social media data, and on the potential utility of data from genetics, electrophysiology, neuroimaging and cognitive testing. Finally, we discuss how far the field has come towards implementing prediction tools in real-world clinical practice. Relatively few retrospective studies to-date include appropriate external validation procedures, and there are even fewer prospective studies testing the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of predictive models. Applications of machine learning in psychiatry face some of the same ethical challenges posed by these techniques in other areas of medicine or computer science, which we discuss here. In short, machine learning is a nascent but important approach to improve the effectiveness of mental health care, and several prospective clinical studies suggest that it may be working already.

Citing Articles

Analyzing Patterns in Anesthesiology Residents' Exam Performance Using Data Mining Techniques.

Karimian M, Rahmatizadeh S, Kohzadi Z, Kohzadi Z, Madadi F, Dabbagh A Anesth Pain Med. 2025; 14(6):e151686.

PMID: 40078646 PMC: 11895782. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-151686.


Neural signatures of emotional biases predict clinical outcomes in difficult-to-treat depression.

Fennema D, Barker G, ODaly O, Godlewska B, Carr E, Goldsmith K Res Dir Depress. 2025; 1:e21.

PMID: 40028885 PMC: 11869767. DOI: 10.1017/dep.2024.6.


Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry: A Review of Biological and Behavioral Data Analyses.

Baydili I, Tasci B, Tasci G Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002587 PMC: 11854694. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040434.


Predicting antipsychotic responsiveness using a machine learning classifier trained on plasma levels of inflammatory markers in schizophrenia.

Yee J, Phua S, See Y, Andiappan A, Goh W, Lee J Transl Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):51.

PMID: 39952924 PMC: 11828904. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03264-z.


Prediction of individual patient outcomes to psychotherapy vs medication for major depression.

LoParo D, Dunlop B, Nemeroff C, Mayberg H, Craighead W Npj Ment Health Res. 2025; 4(1):4.

PMID: 39910171 PMC: 11799290. DOI: 10.1038/s44184-025-00119-9.


References
1.
Phillips M, Chase H, Sheline Y, Etkin A, Almeida J, Deckersbach T . Identifying predictors, moderators, and mediators of antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: neuroimaging approaches. Am J Psychiatry. 2015; 172(2):124-38. PMC: 4464814. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010076. View

2.
Woo C, Chang L, Lindquist M, Wager T . Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(3):365-377. PMC: 5988350. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4478. View

3.
Iniesta R, Malki K, Maier W, Rietschel M, Mors O, Hauser J . Combining clinical variables to optimize prediction of antidepressant treatment outcomes. J Psychiatr Res. 2016; 78:94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.03.016. View

4.
Hoogendoorn M, Berger T, Schulz A, Stolz T, Szolovits P . Predicting Social Anxiety Treatment Outcome Based on Therapeutic Email Conversations. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016; 21(5):1449-1459. PMC: 5613669. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2601123. View

5.
Goldstein-Piekarski A, Korgaonkar M, Green E, Suppes T, Schatzberg A, Hastie T . Human amygdala engagement moderated by early life stress exposure is a biobehavioral target for predicting recovery on antidepressants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(42):11955-11960. PMC: 5081583. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606671113. View