» Articles » PMID: 30623063

Producing an Evidence-based Treatment Information Website in Partnership with People Affected by Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Background And Aims: In earlier work, we identified that people affected by multiple sclerosis (MS) can have difficulty finding online treatment information that is up to date, trustworthy, understandable, and applicable to personal circumstances, but does not provoke confusion or negative emotional consequences. The objective was to develop online consumer summaries of MS treatment evidence (derived from Cochrane Reviews) that respond to identified treatment information needs of people affected by MS.

Methods: A 2-phase mixed-methods project, conducted in partnership with consumers and an MS organisation. Phase 1 included review panels with consumers (Australians affected by MS) and health professionals to test paper-based treatment summaries before development, and pilot testing of the website. Phase 2 involved an online survey after website launch.

Results: Eighty-three participants (85% affected by MS) took part. Phase 1 participants strongly endorsed key review summary components, including layering information, and additional sections to aid personal applicability. Participants additionally suggested questions for health professionals. Participants across both phases were receptive to the idea of being provided with Cochrane Review summaries online but were seeking other types of evidence and information, such as personal experiences and the latest experimental treatments, which could not be provided. While the small survey sample size (n = 58) limits application of the results to a broader population, the website was viewed favourably, as a useful, understandable, and trustworthy information source.

Conclusion: We describe a partnership approach to developing online evidence-based treatment information, underpinned by an in-depth understanding of consumers' information needs.

Citing Articles

Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.

van Leersum C, Jaschinski C, Bults M, van der Zwart J Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):119.

PMID: 39223606 PMC: 11367923. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01152-4.


A multiple sclerosis lifestyle behavior online course: Qualitative analysis of participants' motivations, expectations and experiences.

Neate S, Bevens W, Jelinek P, Gray K, Weiland T, Nag N Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1022185.

PMID: 36568793 PMC: 9768550. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022185.


Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.

Hoekstra F, Trigo F, Sibley K, Graham I, Kennefick M, Mrklas K J Spinal Cord Med. 2022; 46(4):614-631.

PMID: 35262473 PMC: 10274560. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2033578.


A Tripartite Knowledge Translation Program: Innovative Patient-Centered Approach to Clinical Research Participation for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.

Saini A, Cochran C, Zucker-Levin A, Donkers S, Kumar P, Knox K Mult Scler Int. 2021; 2021:5531693.

PMID: 34327022 PMC: 8310439. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5531693.


The IN-DEEP project "INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, Preferences": a web information model on magnetic resonance imaging for people with multiple sclerosis.

Colombo C, Confalonieri P, Rovaris M, La Mantia L, Galeazzi P, Silena Trevisan J Neurol. 2020; 267(8):2421-2431.

PMID: 32361839 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09864-7.


References
1.
Coreil J . Group interview methods in community health research. Med Anthropol. 1995; 16(3):193-210. DOI: 10.1080/01459740.1994.9966115. View

2.
Mills E, Thorlund K, Ioannidis J . Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013; 346:f2914. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2914. View

3.
Page M, Shamseer L, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Tricco A . Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(5):e1002028. PMC: 4878797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028. View

4.
Siemieniuk R, Agoritsas T, Macdonald H, Guyatt G, Brandt L, Vandvik P . Introduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations. BMJ. 2016; 354:i5191. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5191. View

5.
Hay M, Strathmann C, Lieber E, Wick K, Giesser B . Why patients go online: multiple sclerosis, the internet, and physician-patient communication. Neurologist. 2008; 14(6):374-81. DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31817709bb. View