» Articles » PMID: 39223606

Citizen Involvement in Research on Technological Innovations for Health, Care or Well-being: a Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Sep 2
PMID 39223606
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Citizen science can be a powerful approach to foster the successful implementation of technological innovations in health, care or well-being. Involving experience experts as co-researchers or co-designers of technological innovations facilitates mutual learning, community building, and empowerment. By utilizing the expert knowledge of the intended users, innovations have a better chance to get adopted and solve complex health-related problems. As citizen science is still a relatively new practice for health and well-being, little is known about effective methods and guidelines for successful collaboration. This scoping review aims to provide insight in (1) the levels of citizen involvement in current research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being, (2) the used participatory methodologies, and (3) lesson's learned by the researchers.A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The search was performed in SCOPUS in January 2021 and included peer-reviewed journal and conference papers published between 2016 and 2020. The final selection (N = 83) was limited to empirical studies that had a clear focus on technological innovations for health, care or well-being and involved citizens at the level of collaboration or higher. Our results show a growing interest in citizens science as an inclusive research approach. Citizens are predominantly involved in the design phase of innovations and less in the preparation, data-analyses or reporting phase. Eight records had citizens in the lead in one of the research phases.Researcher use different terms to describe their methodological approach including participatory design, co-design, community based participatory research, co-creation, public and patient involvement, partcipatory action research, user-centred design and citizen science. Our selection of cases shows that succesful citizen science projects develop a structural and longitudinal partnership with their collaborators, use a situated and adaptive research approach, and have researchers that are willing to abandon traditional power dynamics and engage in a mutual learning experience.

Citing Articles

A multi-stage approach to support timely health policy decisions during crisis: the fast-track Delphi.

Velarde Creze C, Duperrex O, Lebon L, Faivre V, Pasche M, Cornuz J BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3412.

PMID: 39696176 PMC: 11653821. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20903-0.

References
1.
Russ S, Latif Z, Hazell A, Ogunmuyiwa H, Tapper J, Wachuku-King S . A Smartphone App Designed to Empower Patients to Contribute Toward Safer Surgical Care: Community-Based Evaluation Using a Participatory Approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(1):e12859. PMC: 6997920. DOI: 10.2196/12859. View

2.
Arevian A, OHora J, Jones F, Mango J, Jones L, Williams P . Participatory Technology Development to Enhance Community Resilience. Ethn Dis. 2018; 28(Suppl 2):493-502. PMC: 6128332. DOI: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.493. View

3.
Rosner H . Data on wings. Sci Am. 2013; 308(2):68-73. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0213-68. View

4.
Mrklas K, Barber T, Campbell-Scherer D, Green L, Li L, Marlett N . Co-Design in the Development of a Mobile Health App for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis by Patients and Physicians: Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(7):e17893. PMC: 7382016. DOI: 10.2196/17893. View

5.
Allin S, Shepherd J, Tomasone J, Munce S, Linassi G, Hossain S . Participatory Design of an Online Self-Management Tool for Users With Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018; 5(1):e6. PMC: 5885063. DOI: 10.2196/rehab.8158. View