» Articles » PMID: 17320338

The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an Outcomes and Evaluation Measure for Patient Education and Self-management Interventions for People with Chronic Conditions

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Health Services
Nursing
Date 2007 Feb 27
PMID 17320338
Citations 255
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This paper describes the development and validation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ). The aim was to develop a user-friendly, relevant, and psychometrically sound instrument for the comprehensive evaluation of patient education programs, which can be applied across a broad range of chronic conditions.

Methods: Item development for the heiQ was guided by a Program Logic Model, Concept Mapping, interviews with stakeholders and psychometric analyses. Construction (N=591) and confirmatory (N=598) samples were drawn from consumers of patient education programs and hospital outpatients. The properties of the heiQ were investigated using item response theory and structural equation modeling.

Results: Over 90 candidate items were generated, with 42 items selected for inclusion in the final scale. Eight independent dimensions were derived: Positive and Active Engagement in Life (five items, Cronbach's alpha (alpha)=0.86); Health Directed Behavior (four items, alpha=0.80); Skill and Technique Acquisition (five items, alpha=0.81); Constructive Attitudes and Approaches (five items, alpha=0.81); Self-Monitoring and Insight (seven items, alpha=0.70); Health Service Navigation (five items, alpha=0.82); Social Integration and Support (five items, alpha=0.86); and Emotional Wellbeing (six items, alpha=0.89).

Conclusion: The heiQ has high construct validity and is a reliable measure of a broad range of patient education program benefits.

Practice Implications: The heiQ will provide valuable information to clinicians, researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders about the value of patient education programs in chronic disease management.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Efficacy of Type 2 Diabetes Group Training Courses With and Without the Integration of mHealth Support in a Controlled Trial Setting: Results of a Comparative Pilot Study.

Roth M, Bodenhofer J, Fischill-Neudeck M, Roth C, Domhardt M, Emsenhuber G Diabetes Spectr. 2025; 38(1):58-67.

PMID: 39959529 PMC: 11825395. DOI: 10.2337/ds24-0012.


Assessment of Technology Readiness in Norwegian Older Adults With Long-Term Health Conditions Receiving Home Care Services: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Bergh S, Saltyte Benth J, Hogset L, Rydjord B, Kayser L JMIR Aging. 2025; 8:e62936.

PMID: 39918862 PMC: 11845898. DOI: 10.2196/62936.


Technology Readiness Level and Self-Reported Health in Recipients of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Cross-Sectional Study.

Rosenmeier N, Busk D, Dichman C, Nielsen K, Kayser L, Wagner M JMIR Cardio. 2025; 9:e58219.

PMID: 39913910 PMC: 11843055. DOI: 10.2196/58219.


Creation of Text Vignettes Based on Patient-Reported Data to Facilitate a Better Understanding of the Patient Perspective: Design Study.

Kelly S, Wegener E, Kayser L JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e58077.

PMID: 39908087 PMC: 11840378. DOI: 10.2196/58077.


Translating Evidence-Based Self-Management Interventions Using a Stepped-Care Approach for Patients With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design.

Lambert S, Moodie E, McCusker J, Lokhorst M, Harris C, Langmuir T Psychooncology. 2025; 34(1):e70043.

PMID: 39763142 PMC: 11704335. DOI: 10.1002/pon.70043.