» Articles » PMID: 30274789

Engineering the Direct Repeat Sequence of CrRNA for Optimization of FnCpf1-Mediated Genome Editing in Human Cells

Overview
Journal Mol Ther
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2018 Oct 3
PMID 30274789
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

FnCpf1-mediated genome-editing technologies have enabled a broad range of research and medical applications. Recently, we reported that FnCpf1 possesses activity in human cells and recognizes a more compatible PAM (protospacer adjacent motif, 5'-KYTV-3'), compared with the other two commonly used Cpf1 enzymes (AsCpf1 and LbCpf1), which requires a 5'-TTTN-3' PAM. However, due to the efficiency and fidelity, FnCpf1-based clinical and basic applications remain a challenge. The direct repeat (DR) sequence is one of the key elements for FnCpf1-mediated genome editing. In principle, its engineering should influence the corresponding genome-editing activity and fidelity. Here we showed that the DR mutants [G(-9)A and U(-7)A] could modulate FnCpf1 performance in human cells, enabling enhancement of both genome-editing efficiency and fidelity. These newly identified features will facilitate the design and optimization of CRISPR-Cpf1-based genome-editing strategies.

Citing Articles

Prime Editing and DNA Repair System: Balancing Efficiency with Safety.

Daliri K, Hescheler J, Pfannkuche K Cells. 2024; 13(10.

PMID: 38786078 PMC: 11120019. DOI: 10.3390/cells13100858.


Building Blocks of Artificial CRISPR-Based Systems beyond Nucleases.

Kuzmin A, Tomilin A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1).

PMID: 36613839 PMC: 9820447. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010397.


Precise gene replacement in plants through CRISPR/Cas genome editing technology: current status and future perspectives.

Li S, Xia L aBIOTECH. 2022; 1(1):58-73.

PMID: 36305005 PMC: 9590512. DOI: 10.1007/s42994-019-00009-7.


Two high-fidelity variants: efSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF, which one is better?.

Lv J, Xi H, Lv X, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen H Gene Ther. 2022; 29(7-8):458-463.

PMID: 35095097 DOI: 10.1038/s41434-022-00319-4.


Correlation between type IIIA CRISPR-Cas system and SCCmec in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Zhu T, Zhao Y Arch Microbiol. 2021; 203(10):6275-6286.

PMID: 34668031 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02595-x.


References
1.
Kim D, Kim J, Hur J, Been K, Yoon S, Kim J . Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(8):863-8. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3609. View

2.
Gao L, Cox D, Yan W, Manteiga J, Schneider M, Yamano T . Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities. Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 35(8):789-792. PMC: 5548640. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3900. View

3.
Zetsche B, Gootenberg J, Abudayyeh O, Slaymaker I, Makarova K, Essletzbichler P . Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015; 163(3):759-71. PMC: 4638220. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038. View

4.
Dong D, Ren K, Qiu X, Zheng J, Guo M, Guan X . The crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with CRISPR RNA. Nature. 2016; 532(7600):522-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature17944. View

5.
Kleinstiver B, Tsai S, Prew M, Nguyen N, Welch M, Lopez J . Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(8):869-74. PMC: 4980201. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3620. View