Two High-fidelity Variants: EfSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF, Which One is Better?
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated endonuclease Cas9) nucleases have been widely applied for genome engineering. Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) is compact, which can be packaged in AAV (adeno-associated virus) vector for in vivo gene editing. While, wild-type SaCas9 can induce unwanted off-target mutations and substantially limits the applications. So far, there are two reported SaCas9 variants with high-fidelity, including efSaCas9 from our previous study and SaCas9-HF. However, it remains unknown which one possessing the better fidelity and higher activity. Here, we performed a parallel comparison of efSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF in human cells through fluorescent reporter system and target deep sequencing, respectively. The results demonstrated that efSaCas9 possesses higher cleavage activity and fidelity than SaCas9-HF at the most endogenous sites in human cells. Collectively, our study provides insights for the rational selection of suitable SaCas9 for human genome editing.
Strategies for improving the genome-editing efficiency of class 2 CRISPR/Cas system.
Wang L, Han H Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38588.
PMID: 39397905 PMC: 11471210. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38588.
Full-Length Model of SaCas9-sgRNA-DNA Complex in Cleavage State.
Du W, Zhu H, Qian J, Xue D, Zheng S, Huang Q Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(2).
PMID: 36674715 PMC: 9867433. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021204.
Superior Fidelity and Distinct Editing Outcomes of SaCas9 Compared with SpCas9 in Genome Editing.
Yang Z, Fu Y, Zhao J, Zhang F, Li S, Zhao M Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022; 21(6):1206-1220.
PMID: 36549468 PMC: 11082263. DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.12.003.
Recent Advances in Improving Gene-Editing Specificity through CRISPR-Cas9 Nuclease Engineering.
Huang X, Yang D, Zhang J, Xu J, Chen Y Cells. 2022; 11(14).
PMID: 35883629 PMC: 9319960. DOI: 10.3390/cells11142186.