» Articles » PMID: 35095097

Two High-fidelity Variants: EfSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF, Which One is Better?

Overview
Journal Gene Ther
Date 2022 Jan 31
PMID 35095097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated endonuclease Cas9) nucleases have been widely applied for genome engineering. Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) is compact, which can be packaged in AAV (adeno-associated virus) vector for in vivo gene editing. While, wild-type SaCas9 can induce unwanted off-target mutations and substantially limits the applications. So far, there are two reported SaCas9 variants with high-fidelity, including efSaCas9 from our previous study and SaCas9-HF. However, it remains unknown which one possessing the better fidelity and higher activity. Here, we performed a parallel comparison of efSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF in human cells through fluorescent reporter system and target deep sequencing, respectively. The results demonstrated that efSaCas9 possesses higher cleavage activity and fidelity than SaCas9-HF at the most endogenous sites in human cells. Collectively, our study provides insights for the rational selection of suitable SaCas9 for human genome editing.

Citing Articles

Strategies for improving the genome-editing efficiency of class 2 CRISPR/Cas system.

Wang L, Han H Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38588.

PMID: 39397905 PMC: 11471210. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38588.


Full-Length Model of SaCas9-sgRNA-DNA Complex in Cleavage State.

Du W, Zhu H, Qian J, Xue D, Zheng S, Huang Q Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(2).

PMID: 36674715 PMC: 9867433. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021204.


Superior Fidelity and Distinct Editing Outcomes of SaCas9 Compared with SpCas9 in Genome Editing.

Yang Z, Fu Y, Zhao J, Zhang F, Li S, Zhao M Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022; 21(6):1206-1220.

PMID: 36549468 PMC: 11082263. DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.12.003.


Recent Advances in Improving Gene-Editing Specificity through CRISPR-Cas9 Nuclease Engineering.

Huang X, Yang D, Zhang J, Xu J, Chen Y Cells. 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35883629 PMC: 9319960. DOI: 10.3390/cells11142186.

References
1.
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna J, Charpentier E . A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337(6096):816-21. PMC: 6286148. DOI: 10.1126/science.1225829. View

2.
Cong L, Ran F, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N . Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013; 339(6121):819-23. PMC: 3795411. DOI: 10.1126/science.1231143. View

3.
Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt K, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo J . RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013; 339(6121):823-6. PMC: 3712628. DOI: 10.1126/science.1232033. View

4.
Nelson C, Hakim C, Ousterout D, Thakore P, Moreb E, Castellanos Rivera R . In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science. 2016; 351(6271):403-7. PMC: 4883596. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5143. View

5.
Hsu P, Scott D, Weinstein J, Ran F, Konermann S, Agarwala V . DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(9):827-32. PMC: 3969858. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2647. View