» Articles » PMID: 30255296

Yeast Genetic Interaction Screens in the Age of CRISPR/Cas

Overview
Journal Curr Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2018 Sep 27
PMID 30255296
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ease of performing both forward and reverse genetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, along with its stable haploid state and short generation times, has made this budding yeast the consummate model eukaryote for genetics. The major advantage of using budding yeast for reverse genetics is this organism's highly efficient homology-directed repair, allowing for precise genome editing simply by introducing DNA with homology to the chromosomal target. Although plasmid- and PCR-based genome editing tools are quite efficient, they depend on rare spontaneous DNA breaks near the target sequence. Consequently, they can generate only one genomic edit at a time, and the edit must be associated with a selectable marker. However, CRISPR/Cas technology is efficient enough to permit markerless and multiplexed edits in a single step. These features have made CRISPR/Cas popular for yeast strain engineering in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering applications, but it has not been widely employed for genetic screens. In this review, we critically examine different methods to generate multi-mutant strains in systematic genetic interaction screens and discuss the potential of CRISPR/Cas to supplement or improve on these methods.

Citing Articles

Simplicity within biological complexity.

Przulj N, Malod-Dognin N Bioinform Adv. 2025; 5(1):vbae164.

PMID: 39927291 PMC: 11805345. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae164.


Combining Oligo Pools and Golden Gate Cloning to Create Protein Variant Libraries or Guide RNA Libraries for CRISPR Applications.

Macia Valero A, Prins R, de Vroet T, Billerbeck S Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2850():265-295.

PMID: 39363077 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4220-7_15.


A DNA assembly toolkit to unlock the CRISPR/Cas9 potential for metabolic engineering.

Yuzbashev T, Yuzbasheva E, Melkina O, Patel D, Bubnov D, Dietz H Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):858.

PMID: 37596335 PMC: 10439232. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05202-5.


CRI-SPA: a high-throughput method for systematic genetic editing of yeast libraries.

Cachera P, Olsson H, Coumou H, Jensen M, Sanchez B, Strucko T Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(17):e91.

PMID: 37572348 PMC: 10516668. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad656.


Improving therapeutic protein secretion in the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii using a multifactorial engineering approach.

Durmusoglu D, AlAbri I, Li Z, Islam Williams T, Collins L, Martinez J Microb Cell Fact. 2023; 22(1):109.

PMID: 37287064 PMC: 10245609. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-023-02117-y.


References
1.
Voth W, Jiang Y, Stillman D . New 'marker swap' plasmids for converting selectable markers on budding yeast gene disruptions and plasmids. Yeast. 2003; 20(11):985-93. DOI: 10.1002/yea.1018. View

2.
Duffy S, Fam H, Wang Y, Styles E, Kim J, Ang J . Overexpression screens identify conserved dosage chromosome instability genes in yeast and human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(36):9967-76. PMC: 5018746. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611839113. View

3.
Roggenkamp E, Giersch R, Wedeman E, Eaton M, Turnquist E, Schrock M . CRISPR-UnLOCK: Multipurpose Cas9-Based Strategies for Conversion of Yeast Libraries and Strains. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:1773. PMC: 5611381. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01773. View

4.
Li Z, Vizeacoumar F, Bahr S, Li J, Warringer J, Vizeacoumar F . Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29(4):361-7. PMC: 3286520. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1832. View

5.
Haber J, Braberg H, Wu Q, Alexander R, Haase J, Ryan C . Systematic triple-mutant analysis uncovers functional connectivity between pathways involved in chromosome regulation. Cell Rep. 2013; 3(6):2168-78. PMC: 3718395. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.007. View