» Articles » PMID: 32883316

Advances in Synthetic Lethality for Cancer Therapy: Cellular Mechanism and Clinical Translation

Overview
Journal J Hematol Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Hematology
Oncology
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32883316
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Synthetic lethality is a lethal phenomenon in which the occurrence of a single genetic event is tolerable for cell survival, whereas the co-occurrence of multiple genetic events results in cell death. The main obstacle for synthetic lethality lies in the tumor biology heterogeneity and complexity, the inadequate understanding of synthetic lethal interactions, drug resistance, and the challenges regarding screening and clinical translation. Recently, DNA damage response inhibitors are being tested in various trials with promising results. This review will describe the current challenges, development, and opportunities for synthetic lethality in cancer therapy. The characterization of potential synthetic lethal interactions and novel technologies to develop a more effective targeted drug for cancer patients will be explored. Furthermore, this review will discuss the clinical development and drug resistance mechanisms of synthetic lethality in cancer therapy. The ultimate goal of this review is to guide clinicians at selecting patients that will receive the maximum benefits of DNA damage response inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Citing Articles

PRODE recovers essential and context-essential genes through neighborhood-informed scores.

Cantore T, Gasperini P, Bevilacqua R, Ciani Y, Sinha S, Ruppin E Genome Biol. 2025; 26(1):42.

PMID: 40022167 PMC: 11869679. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-025-03501-0.


The Tight Relationship Between the Tumoral Microenvironment and Radium-223.

Conte M, Tomaciello M, De Feo M, Frantellizzi V, Marampon F, De Cristofaro F Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002869 PMC: 11853176. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020456.


Side-stepping the guardian of the genome: current cancer therapeutics targeting mutant p53.

Taritsa I, Fossel E Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1529483.

PMID: 39944631 PMC: 11813898. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1529483.


Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.

Dikoglu E, Pareja F Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025; 1464():237-257.

PMID: 39821029 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-70875-6_13.


Benchmarking machine learning methods for synthetic lethality prediction in cancer.

Feng Y, Long Y, Wang H, Ouyang Y, Li Q, Wu M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9058.

PMID: 39428397 PMC: 11491473. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52900-7.


References
1.
Kantidze O, Velichko A, Luzhin A, Petrova N, Razin S . Synthetically Lethal Interactions of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs. Trends Cancer. 2018; 4(11):755-768. DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.09.007. View

2.
Huang T, Fowler F, Chen C, Shen Z, Sleckman B, Tyler J . The Histone Chaperones ASF1 and CAF-1 Promote MMS22L-TONSL-Mediated Rad51 Loading onto ssDNA during Homologous Recombination in Human Cells. Mol Cell. 2018; 69(5):879-892.e5. PMC: 5843376. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.031. View

3.
Ryan C, Bajrami I, Lord C . Synthetic Lethality and Cancer - Penetrance as the Major Barrier. Trends Cancer. 2018; 4(10):671-683. DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.08.003. View

4.
Dietlein F, Thelen L, Jokic M, Jachimowicz R, Ivan L, Knittel G . A functional cancer genomics screen identifies a druggable synthetic lethal interaction between MSH3 and PRKDC. Cancer Discov. 2014; 4(5):592-605. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0907. View

5.
Baluapuri A, Wolf E, Eilers M . Target gene-independent functions of MYC oncoproteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020; 21(5):255-267. PMC: 7611238. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-0215-2. View