» Articles » PMID: 29786557

The Gene Regulatory Network of MESC Differentiation: a Benchmark for Reverse Engineering Methods

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 May 23
PMID 29786557
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A large body of data have accumulated that characterize the gene regulatory network of stem cells. Yet, a comprehensive and integrative understanding of this complex network is lacking. Network reverse engineering methods that use transcriptome data to derive these networks may help to uncover the topology in an unbiased way. Many methods exist that use co-expression to reconstruct networks. However, it remains unclear how these methods perform in the context of stem cell differentiation, as most systematic assessments have been made for regulatory networks of unicellular organisms. Here, we report a systematic benchmark of different reverse engineering methods against functional data. We show that network pruning is critical for reconstruction performance. We also find that performance is similar for algorithms that use different co-expression measures, i.e. mutual information or correlation. In addition, different methods yield very different network topologies, highlighting the challenge of interpreting these resulting networks as a whole.This article is part of the theme issue 'Designer human tissue: coming to a lab near you'.

Citing Articles

Inferring upstream regulatory genes of FOXP3 in human regulatory T cells from time-series transcriptomic data.

Magni S, Sawlekar R, Capelle C, Tslaf V, Baron A, Zeng N NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):59.

PMID: 38811598 PMC: 11137136. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00387-9.


Robust network inference using response logic.

Gross T, Wongchenko M, Yan Y, Bluthgen N Bioinformatics. 2019; 35(14):i634-i642.

PMID: 31510692 PMC: 6612863. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz326.


Designer human tissue: coming to a lab near you.

Hay D, OFarrelly C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373(1750).

PMID: 29786548 PMC: 5974436. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0212.

References
1.
Cusanovich D, Pavlovic B, Pritchard J, Gilad Y . The functional consequences of variation in transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(3):e1004226. PMC: 3945204. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004226. View

2.
Milo R, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U . Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science. 2002; 298(5594):824-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5594.824. View

3.
Trott J, Hayashi K, Surani A, Babu M, Martinez-Arias A . Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency. Mol Biosyst. 2012; 8(3):744-52. DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05398a. View

4.
Correa-Cerro L, Piao Y, Sharov A, Nishiyama A, Cadet J, Yu H . Generation of mouse ES cell lines engineered for the forced induction of transcription factors. Sci Rep. 2012; 1:167. PMC: 3240988. DOI: 10.1038/srep00167. View

5.
Som A, Harder C, Greber B, Siatkowski M, Paudel Y, Warsow G . The PluriNetWork: an electronic representation of the network underlying pluripotency in mouse, and its applications. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12):e15165. PMC: 3003487. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015165. View