» Articles » PMID: 29772713

Genetic Optimization Algorithm for Metabolic Engineering Revisited

Overview
Journal Metabolites
Publisher MDPI
Date 2018 May 19
PMID 29772713
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To date, several independent methods and algorithms exist for exploiting constraint-based stoichiometric models to find metabolic engineering strategies that optimize microbial production performance. Optimization procedures based on metaheuristics facilitate a straightforward adaption and expansion of engineering objectives, as well as fitness functions, while being particularly suited for solving problems of high complexity. With the increasing interest in multi-scale models and a need for solving advanced engineering problems, we strive to advance genetic algorithms, which stand out due to their intuitive optimization principles and the proven usefulness in this field of research. A drawback of genetic algorithms is that premature convergence to sub-optimal solutions easily occurs if the optimization parameters are not adapted to the specific problem. Here, we conducted comprehensive parameter sensitivity analyses to study their impact on finding optimal strain designs. We further demonstrate the capability of genetic algorithms to simultaneously handle (i) multiple, non-linear engineering objectives; (ii) the identification of gene target-sets according to logical gene-protein-reaction associations; (iii) minimization of the number of network perturbations; and (iv) the insertion of non-native reactions, while employing genome-scale metabolic models. This framework adds a level of sophistication in terms of strain design robustness, which is exemplarily tested on succinate overproduction in .

Citing Articles

Parameter inference for enzyme and temperature constrained genome-scale models.

Pettersen J, Almaas E Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6079.

PMID: 37055413 PMC: 10102030. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32982-x.


GPRuler: Metabolic gene-protein-reaction rules automatic reconstruction.

Di Filippo M, Damiani C, Pescini D PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(11):e1009550.

PMID: 34748537 PMC: 8601613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009550.


Proteome Regulation Patterns Determine Escherichia coli Wild-Type and Mutant Phenotypes.

Alter T, Blank L, Ebert B mSystems. 2021; 6(2).

PMID: 33688016 PMC: 8546978. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00625-20.


An extended and generalized framework for the calculation of metabolic intervention strategies based on minimal cut sets.

Schneider P, von Kamp A, Klamt S PLoS Comput Biol. 2020; 16(7):e1008110.

PMID: 32716928 PMC: 7410339. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008110.


Determination of growth-coupling strategies and their underlying principles.

Alter T, Ebert B BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(1):447.

PMID: 31462231 PMC: 6714386. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2946-7.

References
1.
Maia P, Rocha M, Rocha I . In Silico Constraint-Based Strain Optimization Methods: the Quest for Optimal Cell Factories. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015; 80(1):45-67. PMC: 4711187. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00014-15. View

2.
Orth J, Fleming R, Palsson B . Reconstruction and Use of Microbial Metabolic Networks: the Core Escherichia coli Metabolic Model as an Educational Guide. EcoSal Plus. 2015; 4(1). DOI: 10.1128/ecosalplus.10.2.1. View

3.
Brochado A, Andrejev S, Maranas C, Patil K . Impact of stoichiometry representation on simulation of genotype-phenotype relationships in metabolic networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(11):e1002758. PMC: 3486866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002758. View

4.
Brochado A, Patil K . Overexpression of O-methyltransferase leads to improved vanillin production in baker's yeast only when complemented with model-guided network engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012; 110(2):656-9. DOI: 10.1002/bit.24731. View

5.
Kim J, Reed J, Maravelias C . Large-scale bi-level strain design approaches and mixed-integer programming solution techniques. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24162. PMC: 3175644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024162. View