» Articles » PMID: 31462231

Determination of Growth-coupling Strategies and Their Underlying Principles

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Aug 30
PMID 31462231
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Metabolic coupling of product synthesis and microbial growth is a prominent approach for maximizing production performance. Growth-coupling (GC) also helps stabilizing target production and allows the selection of superior production strains by adaptive laboratory evolution. To support the implementation of growth-coupling strain designs, we seek to identify biologically relevant, metabolic principles that enforce strong growth-coupling on the basis of reaction knockouts.

Results: We adapted an established bilevel programming framework to maximize the minimally guaranteed production rate at a fixed, medium growth rate. Using this revised formulation, we identified various GC intervention strategies for metabolites of the central carbon metabolism, which were examined for GC generating principles under diverse conditions. Curtailing the metabolism to render product formation an essential carbon drain was identified as one major strategy generating strong coupling of metabolic activity and target synthesis. Impeding the balancing of cofactors and protons in the absence of target production was the underlying principle of all other strategies and further increased the GC strength of the aforementioned strategies.

Conclusion: Maximizing the minimally guaranteed production rate at a medium growth rate is an attractive principle for the identification of strain designs that couple growth to target metabolite production. Moreover, it allows for controlling the inevitable compromise between growth coupling strength and the retaining of microbial viability. With regard to the corresponding metabolic principles, generating a dependency between the supply of global metabolic cofactors and product synthesis appears to be advantageous in enforcing strong GC for any metabolite. Deriving such strategies manually, is a hard task, due to which we suggest incorporating computational metabolic network analyses in metabolic engineering projects seeking to determine GC strain designs.

Citing Articles

Metabolic growth-coupling strategies for enzyme selection systems.

Alter T, Pieters P, Lloyd C, Feist A, Ozdemir E, Palsson B Metab Eng Commun. 2025; 20:e00257.

PMID: 40070513 PMC: 11894327. DOI: 10.1016/j.mec.2025.e00257.


Design principles for engineering bacteria to maximise chemical production from batch cultures.

Mannan A, Darlington A, Tanaka R, Bates D Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):279.

PMID: 39747041 PMC: 11696108. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55347-y.


A versatile microbial platform as a tunable whole-cell chemical sensor.

Hernandez-Sancho J, Boudigou A, Alvan-Vargas M, Freund D, Arnling Baath J, Westh P Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8316.

PMID: 39333077 PMC: 11436707. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52755-y.


FastKnock: an efficient next-generation approach to identify all knockout strategies for strain optimization.

Hassani L, Moosavi M, Setoodeh P, Zare H Microb Cell Fact. 2024; 23(1):37.

PMID: 38287320 PMC: 10823710. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-023-02277-x.


A Fermentation State Marker Rule Design Task in Metabolic Engineering.

Stalidzans E, Muiznieks R, Dubencovs K, Sile E, Berzins K, Suleiko A Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38136018 PMC: 10740952. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121427.


References
1.
Schuster S, Dandekar T, Fell D . Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 1999; 17(2):53-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7799(98)01290-6. View

2.
Burgard A, Maranas C . Optimization-based framework for inferring and testing hypothesized metabolic objective functions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 82(6):670-7. DOI: 10.1002/bit.10617. View

3.
Jensen P, Michelsen O . Carbon and energy metabolism of atp mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1992; 174(23):7635-41. PMC: 207475. DOI: 10.1128/jb.174.23.7635-7641.1992. View

4.
Nakamura C, Whited G . Metabolic engineering for the microbial production of 1,3-propanediol. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003; 14(5):454-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.005. View

5.
Burgard A, Pharkya P, Maranas C . Optknock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 84(6):647-57. DOI: 10.1002/bit.10803. View