» Articles » PMID: 37055413

Parameter Inference for Enzyme and Temperature Constrained Genome-scale Models

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Apr 13
PMID 37055413
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The metabolism of all living organisms is dependent on temperature, and therefore, having a good method to predict temperature effects at a system level is of importance. A recently developed Bayesian computational framework for enzyme and temperature constrained genome-scale models (etcGEM) predicts the temperature dependence of an organism's metabolic network from thermodynamic properties of the metabolic enzymes, markedly expanding the scope and applicability of constraint-based metabolic modelling. Here, we show that the Bayesian calculation method for inferring parameters for an etcGEM is unstable and unable to estimate the posterior distribution. The Bayesian calculation method assumes that the posterior distribution is unimodal, and thus fails due to the multimodality of the problem. To remedy this problem, we developed an evolutionary algorithm which is able to obtain a diversity of solutions in this multimodal parameter space. We quantified the phenotypic consequences on six metabolic network signature reactions of the different parameter solutions resulting from use of the evolutionary algorithm. While two of these reactions showed little phenotypic variation between the solutions, the remainder displayed huge variation in flux-carrying capacity. This result indicates that the model is under-determined given current experimental data and that more data is required to narrow down the model predictions. Finally, we made improvements to the software to reduce the running time of the parameter set evaluations by a factor of 8.5, allowing for obtaining results faster and with less computational resources.

References
1.
Postmus J, Canelas A, Bouwman J, Bakker B, van Gulik W, Teixeira de Mattos M . Quantitative analysis of the high temperature-induced glycolytic flux increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals dominant metabolic regulation. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283(35):23524-32. PMC: 3259761. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M802908200. View

2.
Winter G, Kromer J . Fluxomics - connecting 'omics analysis and phenotypes. Environ Microbiol. 2013; 15(7):1901-16. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12064. View

3.
Rocha M, Maia P, Mendes R, Pinto J, Ferreira E, Nielsen J . Natural computation meta-heuristics for the in silico optimization of microbial strains. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9:499. PMC: 2612012. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-499. View

4.
Molina A, Swiegers J, Varela C, Pretorius I, Agosin E . Influence of wine fermentation temperature on the synthesis of yeast-derived volatile aroma compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 77(3):675-87. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1194-3. View

5.
Zakhartsev M, Yang X, Reuss M, Portner H . Metabolic efficiency in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to temperature dependent growth and biomass yield. J Therm Biol. 2015; 52:117-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.05.008. View