» Articles » PMID: 29746458

How Stimulation Frequency and Intensity Impact on the Long-lasting Effects of Coordinated Reset Stimulation

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 May 11
PMID 29746458
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several brain diseases are characterized by abnormally strong neuronal synchrony. Coordinated Reset (CR) stimulation was computationally designed to specifically counteract abnormal neuronal synchronization processes by desynchronization. In the presence of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) this may lead to a decrease of synaptic excitatory weights and ultimately to an anti-kindling, i.e. unlearning of abnormal synaptic connectivity and abnormal neuronal synchrony. The long-lasting desynchronizing impact of CR stimulation has been verified in pre-clinical and clinical proof of concept studies. However, as yet it is unclear how to optimally choose the CR stimulation frequency, i.e. the repetition rate at which the CR stimuli are delivered. This work presents the first computational study on the dependence of the acute and long-term outcome on the CR stimulation frequency in neuronal networks with STDP. For this purpose, CR stimulation was applied with Rapidly Varying Sequences (RVS) as well as with Slowly Varying Sequences (SVS) in a wide range of stimulation frequencies and intensities. Our findings demonstrate that acute desynchronization, achieved during stimulation, does not necessarily lead to long-term desynchronization after cessation of stimulation. By comparing the long-term effects of the two different CR protocols, the RVS CR stimulation turned out to be more robust against variations of the stimulation frequency. However, SVS CR stimulation can obtain stronger anti-kindling effects. We revealed specific parameter ranges that are favorable for long-term desynchronization. For instance, RVS CR stimulation at weak intensities and with stimulation frequencies in the range of the neuronal firing rates turned out to be effective and robust, in particular, if no closed loop adaptation of stimulation parameters is (technically) available. From a clinical standpoint, this may be relevant in the context of both invasive as well as non-invasive CR stimulation.

Citing Articles

TMS-induced phase resets depend on TMS intensity and EEG phase.

Erickson B, Kim B, Sabes P, Rich R, Hatcher A, Fernandez-Nunez G J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(5).

PMID: 39321851 PMC: 11500019. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad7f87.


Synaptic reorganization of synchronized neuronal networks with synaptic weight and structural plasticity.

Chauhan K, Neiman A, Tass P PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(7):e1012261.

PMID: 38980898 PMC: 11259284. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012261.


Coordinated reset stimulation of plastic neural networks with spatially dependent synaptic connections.

Kromer J, Tass P Front Netw Physiol. 2024; 4:1351815.

PMID: 38863734 PMC: 11165135. DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1351815.


An exploratory computational analysis in mice brain networks of widespread epileptic seizure onset locations along with potential strategies for effective intervention and propagation control.

Courson J, Quoy M, Timofeeva Y, Manos T Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1360009.

PMID: 38468870 PMC: 10925689. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1360009.


Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications.

Sandoval-Pistorius S, Hacker M, Waters A, Wang J, Provenza N, de Hemptinne C J Neurosci. 2023; 43(45):7575-7586.

PMID: 37940596 PMC: 10634582. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1427-23.2023.


References
1.
Wang X . Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends Neurosci. 2001; 24(8):455-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01868-3. View

2.
Tass P, Majtanik M . Long-term anti-kindling effects of desynchronizing brain stimulation: a theoretical study. Biol Cybern. 2005; 94(1):58-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-005-0028-6. View

3.
van Dijk K, Verhagen R, Chaturvedi A, McIntyre C, Bour L, Heida C . A novel lead design enables selective deep brain stimulation of neural populations in the subthalamic region. J Neural Eng. 2015; 12(4):046003. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046003. View

4.
Terman D, Rubin J, Yew A, Wilson C . Activity patterns in a model for the subthalamopallidal network of the basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(7):2963-76. PMC: 6758326. DOI: 20026266. View

5.
Amit D, Brunel N . Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1997; 7(3):237-52. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/7.3.237. View