» Articles » PMID: 25505882

Coordinated Reset Stimulation in a Large-scale Model of the STN-GPe Circuit

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Dec 16
PMID 25505882
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Synchronization of populations of neurons is a hallmark of several brain diseases. Coordinated reset (CR) stimulation is a model-based stimulation technique which specifically counteracts abnormal synchrony by desynchronization. Electrical CR stimulation, e.g., for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), is administered via depth electrodes. In order to get a deeper understanding of this technique, we extended the top-down approach of previous studies and constructed a large-scale computational model of the respective brain areas. Furthermore, we took into account the spatial anatomical properties of the simulated brain structures and incorporated a detailed numerical representation of 2 · 10(4) simulated neurons. We simulated the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus externus (GPe). Connections within the STN were governed by spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP). In this way, we modeled the physiological and pathological activity of the considered brain structures. In particular, we investigated how plasticity could be exploited and how the model could be shifted from strongly synchronized (pathological) activity to strongly desynchronized (healthy) activity of the neuronal populations via CR stimulation of the STN neurons. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of specific stimulation parameters especially the electrode position on the stimulation outcome. Our model provides a step forward toward a biophysically realistic model of the brain areas relevant to the emergence of pathological neuronal activity in PD. Furthermore, our model constitutes a test bench for the optimization of both stimulation parameters and novel electrode geometries for efficient CR stimulation.

Citing Articles

Synaptic reorganization of synchronized neuronal networks with synaptic weight and structural plasticity.

Chauhan K, Neiman A, Tass P PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(7):e1012261.

PMID: 38980898 PMC: 11259284. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012261.


Coordinated reset stimulation of plastic neural networks with spatially dependent synaptic connections.

Kromer J, Tass P Front Netw Physiol. 2024; 4:1351815.

PMID: 38863734 PMC: 11165135. DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1351815.


Virtual brain twins: from basic neuroscience to clinical use.

Wang H, Triebkorn P, Breyton M, Dollomaja B, Lemarechal J, Petkoski S Natl Sci Rev. 2024; 11(5):nwae079.

PMID: 38698901 PMC: 11065363. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwae079.


A dynamical computational model of theta generation in hippocampal circuits to study theta-gamma oscillations during neurostimulation.

Vardalakis N, Aussel A, Rougier N, Wagner F Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38354040 PMC: 10942594. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87356.


Neuronal and synaptic adaptations underlying the benefits of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Xu W, Wang J, Li X, Liang J, Song L, Wu Y Transl Neurodegener. 2023; 12(1):55.

PMID: 38037124 PMC: 10688037. DOI: 10.1186/s40035-023-00390-w.


References
1.
Kita H, Chang H, Kitai S . The morphology of intracellularly labeled rat subthalamic neurons: a light microscopic analysis. J Comp Neurol. 1983; 215(3):245-57. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902150302. View

2.
Chaturvedi A, Butson C, Lempka S, Cooper S, McIntyre C . Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions. Brain Stimul. 2010; 3(2):65-7. PMC: 2895675. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.01.003. View

3.
Tass P, Majtanik M . Long-term anti-kindling effects of desynchronizing brain stimulation: a theoretical study. Biol Cybern. 2005; 94(1):58-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-005-0028-6. View

4.
Kita H, Tachibana Y, Nambu A, Chiken S . Balance of monosynaptic excitatory and disynaptic inhibitory responses of the globus pallidus induced after stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(38):8611-9. PMC: 6725523. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1719-05.2005. View

5.
Butson C, McIntyre C . Differences among implanted pulse generator waveforms cause variations in the neural response to deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(8):1889-94. PMC: 2075350. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.05.061. View