» Articles » PMID: 39321851

TMS-induced Phase Resets Depend on TMS Intensity and EEG Phase

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2024 Sep 25
PMID 39321851
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. The phase of the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal predicts performance in motor, somatosensory, and cognitive functions. Studies suggest that brain phase resets align neural oscillations with external stimuli, or couple oscillations across frequency bands and brain regions. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can cause phase resets noninvasively in the cortex, thus providing the potential to control phase-sensitive cognitive functions. However, the relationship between TMS parameters and phase resetting is not fully understood. This is especially true of TMS intensity, which may be crucial to enabling precise control over the amount of phase resetting that is induced. Additionally, TMS phase resetting may interact with the instantaneous phase of the brain. Understanding these relationships is crucial to the development of more powerful and controllable stimulation protocols.To test these relationships, we conducted a TMS-EEG study. We applied single-pulse TMS at varying degrees of stimulation intensity to the motor area in an open loop. Offline, we used an autoregressive algorithm to estimate the phase of the intrinsic-Alpha rhythm of the motor cortex at the moment each TMS pulse was delivered.. We identified post-stimulation epochs where-Alpha phase resetting and N100 amplitude depend parametrically on TMS intensity and are significantperipheral auditory sham stimulation. We observed-Alpha phase inversion after stimulations near peaks but not troughs in the endogenous-Alpha rhythm.. These data suggest that low-intensity TMS primarily resets existing oscillations, while at higher intensities TMS may activate previously silent neurons, but only when endogenous oscillations are near the peak phase. These data can guide future studies that seek to induce phase resetting, and point to a way to manipulate the phase resetting effect of TMS by varying only the timing of the pulse with respect to ongoing brain activity.

References
1.
Ilic T, Meintzschel F, Cleff U, Ruge D, Kessler K, Ziemann U . Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity. J Physiol. 2002; 545(1):153-67. PMC: 2290644. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.030122. View

2.
Madsen K, Karabanov A, Krohne L, Safeldt M, Tomasevic L, Siebner H . No trace of phase: Corticomotor excitability is not tuned by phase of pericentral mu-rhythm. Brain Stimul. 2019; 12(5):1261-1270. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.05.005. View

3.
Lancaster J, Tordesillas-Gutierrez D, Martinez M, Salinas F, Evans A, Zilles K . Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007; 28(11):1194-205. PMC: 6871323. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20345. View

4.
Mentzelopoulos G, Driscoll N, Shankar S, Kim B, Rich R, Fernandez-Nunez G . Alerting attention is sufficient to induce a phase-dependent behavior that can be predicted by frontal EEG. Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1176865. PMC: 10246752. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1176865. View

5.
Thut G, Veniero D, Romei V, Miniussi C, Schyns P, Gross J . Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr Biol. 2011; 21(14):1176-85. PMC: 3176892. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049. View