» Articles » PMID: 29517819

MR-assisted PET Motion Correction in Simultaneous PET/MRI Studies of Dementia Subjects

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 9
PMID 29517819
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Subject motion in positron emission tomography (PET) studies leads to image blurring and artifacts; simultaneously acquired magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data provides a means for motion correction (MC) in integrated PET/MRI scanners.

Purpose: To assess the effect of realistic head motion and MR-based MC on static [ F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET images in dementia patients.

Study Type: Observational study.

Population: Thirty dementia subjects were recruited.

Field Strength/sequence: 3T hybrid PET/MR scanner where EPI-based and T -weighted sequences were acquired simultaneously with the PET data.

Assessment: Head motion parameters estimated from high temporal resolution MR volumes were used for PET MC. The MR-based MC method was compared to PET frame-based MC methods in which motion parameters were estimated by coregistering 5-minute frames before and after accounting for the attenuation-emission mismatch. The relative changes in standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) between the PET volumes processed with the various MC methods, without MC, and the PET volumes with simulated motion were compared in relevant brain regions.

Statistical Tests: The absolute value of the regional SUVR relative change was assessed with pairwise paired t-tests testing at the P = 0.05 level, comparing the values obtained through different MR-based MC processing methods as well as across different motion groups. The intraregion voxelwise variability of regional SUVRs obtained through different MR-based MC processing methods was also assessed with pairwise paired t-tests testing at the P = 0.05 level.

Results: MC had a greater impact on PET data quantification in subjects with larger amplitude motion (higher than 18% in the medial orbitofrontal cortex) and greater changes were generally observed for the MR-based MC method compared to the frame-based methods. Furthermore, a mean relative change of ∼4% was observed after MC even at the group level, suggesting the importance of routinely applying this correction. The intraregion voxelwise variability of regional SUVRs was also decreased using MR-based MC. All comparisons were significant at the P = 0.05 level.

Data Conclusion: Incorporating temporally correlated MR data to account for intraframe motion has a positive impact on the FDG PET image quality and data quantification in dementia patients.

Level Of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1288-1296.

Citing Articles

Effects of List-Mode-Based Intraframe Motion Correction in Dynamic Brain PET Imaging.

Tiss A, Chemli Y, Guehl N, Marin T, Johnson K, El Fakhri G IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2024; 8(8):950-958.

PMID: 39507127 PMC: 11540417. DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2024.3432322.


Motion-correction strategies for enhancing whole-body PET imaging.

Wang J, Bermudez D, Chen W, Durgavarjhula D, Randell C, Uyanik M Front Nucl Med. 2024; 4.

PMID: 39118964 PMC: 11308502. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1257880.


Current Trends and Applications of PET/MRI Hybrid Imaging in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Normal Aging.

Lee J, Renslo J, Wong K, Clifford T, Beutler B, Kim P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535006 PMC: 10969187. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060585.


Preliminary Exploration of Pseudo-CT-Based Attenuation Correction for Simultaneous PET/MRI Brain Imaging in Nonhuman Primates.

Yoo C, DuBois J, Wang L, Tang Y, Hou L, Xu H ACS Omega. 2023; 8(48):45438-45446.

PMID: 38075761 PMC: 10702200. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04824.


Markerless head motion tracking and event-by-event correction in brain PET.

Zeng T, Lu Y, Jiang W, Zheng J, Zhang J, Gravel P Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(24).

PMID: 37983915 PMC: 10713921. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0e37.


References
1.
Ullisch M, Scheins J, Weirich C, Rota Kops E, Celik A, Tellmann L . MR-based PET motion correction procedure for simultaneous MR-PET neuroimaging of human brain. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48149. PMC: 3495949. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048149. View

2.
Cheng Y, Chen T, Chiu M . From mild cognitive impairment to subjective cognitive decline: conceptual and methodological evolution. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017; 13:491-498. PMC: 5317337. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S123428. View

3.
Ikari Y, Nishio T, Makishi Y, Miya Y, Ito K, Koeppe R . Head motion evaluation and correction for PET scans with 18F-FDG in the Japanese Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (J-ADNI) multi-center study. Ann Nucl Med. 2012; 26(7):535-44. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0605-4. View

4.
Walhovd K, Fjell A, Brewer J, McEvoy L, Fennema-Notestine C, Hagler Jr D . Combining MR imaging, positron-emission tomography, and CSF biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31(2):347-54. PMC: 2821467. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1809. View

5.
Tisdall M, Hess A, Reuter M, Meintjes E, Fischl B, van der Kouwe A . Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 68(2):389-99. PMC: 3320676. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23228. View