» Articles » PMID: 29401388

Flex DdG: Rosetta Ensemble-Based Estimation of Changes in Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Upon Mutation

Overview
Journal J Phys Chem B
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2018 Feb 6
PMID 29401388
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computationally modeling changes in binding free energies upon mutation (interface ΔΔ G) allows large-scale prediction and perturbation of protein-protein interactions. Additionally, methods that consider and sample relevant conformational plasticity should be able to achieve higher prediction accuracy over methods that do not. To test this hypothesis, we developed a method within the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite (flex ddG) that samples conformational diversity using "backrub" to generate an ensemble of models and then applies torsion minimization, side chain repacking, and averaging across this ensemble to estimate interface ΔΔ G values. We tested our method on a curated benchmark set of 1240 mutants, and found the method outperformed existing methods that sampled conformational space to a lesser degree. We observed considerable improvements with flex ddG over existing methods on the subset of small side chain to large side chain mutations, as well as for multiple simultaneous non-alanine mutations, stabilizing mutations, and mutations in antibody-antigen interfaces. Finally, we applied a generalized additive model (GAM) approach to the Rosetta energy function; the resulting nonlinear reweighting model improved the agreement with experimentally determined interface ΔΔ G values but also highlighted the necessity of future energy function improvements.

Citing Articles

Prospective evaluation of structure-based simulations reveal their ability to predict the impact of kinase mutations on inhibitor binding.

Singh S, Gapsys V, Aldeghi M, Schaller D, Rangwala A, White J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060600 PMC: 11888192. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.15.623861.


Unraveling the molecular basis of substrate specificity and halogen activation in vanadium-dependent haloperoxidases.

Zeides P, Bellmann-Sickert K, Zhang R, Seel C, Most V, Schoeder C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2083.

PMID: 40021637 PMC: 11871015. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57023-1.


Decoding the effects of mutation on protein interactions using machine learning.

Xu W, Li A, Zhao Y, Peng Y Biophys Rev (Melville). 2025; 6(1):011307.

PMID: 40013003 PMC: 11857871. DOI: 10.1063/5.0249920.


Combining computational modeling and experimental library screening to affinity-mature VEEV-neutralizing antibody F5.

Sumner C, Schwedler J, McCoy K, Holland J, Duva V, Gelperin D Protein Sci. 2025; 34(2):e70043.

PMID: 39840828 PMC: 11752144. DOI: 10.1002/pro.70043.


Decoding the functional impact of the cancer genome through protein-protein interactions.

Fu H, Mo X, Ivanov A Nat Rev Cancer. 2025; 25(3):189-208.

PMID: 39810024 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00784-6.


References
1.
Vangone A, Bonvin A . Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein-protein complexes. Elife. 2015; 4:e07454. PMC: 4523921. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07454. View

2.
Dehouck Y, Kwasigroch J, Rooman M, Gilis D . BeAtMuSiC: Prediction of changes in protein-protein binding affinity on mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(Web Server issue):W333-9. PMC: 3692068. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt450. View

3.
Guerois R, Nielsen J, Serrano L . Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol. 2002; 320(2):369-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4. View

4.
Friedland G, Linares A, Smith C, Kortemme T . A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. J Mol Biol. 2008; 380(4):757-74. PMC: 3574579. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.006. View

5.
Chevalier A, Silva D, Rocklin G, Hicks D, Vergara R, Murapa P . Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics. Nature. 2017; 550(7674):74-79. PMC: 5802399. DOI: 10.1038/nature23912. View