» Articles » PMID: 26335248

A Web Resource for Standardized Benchmark Datasets, Metrics, and Rosetta Protocols for Macromolecular Modeling and Design

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Sep 4
PMID 26335248
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development and validation of computational macromolecular modeling and design methods depend on suitable benchmark datasets and informative metrics for comparing protocols. In addition, if a method is intended to be adopted broadly in diverse biological applications, there needs to be information on appropriate parameters for each protocol, as well as metrics describing the expected accuracy compared to experimental data. In certain disciplines, there exist established benchmarks and public resources where experts in a particular methodology are encouraged to supply their most efficient implementation of each particular benchmark. We aim to provide such a resource for protocols in macromolecular modeling and design. We present a freely accessible web resource (https://kortemmelab.ucsf.edu/benchmarks) to guide the development of protocols for protein modeling and design. The site provides benchmark datasets and metrics to compare the performance of a variety of modeling protocols using different computational sampling methods and energy functions, providing a "best practice" set of parameters for each method. Each benchmark has an associated downloadable benchmark capture archive containing the input files, analysis scripts, and tutorials for running the benchmark. The captures may be run with any suitable modeling method; we supply command lines for running the benchmarks using the Rosetta software suite. We have compiled initial benchmarks for the resource spanning three key areas: prediction of energetic effects of mutations, protein design, and protein structure prediction, each with associated state-of-the-art modeling protocols. With the help of the wider macromolecular modeling community, we hope to expand the variety of benchmarks included on the website and continue to evaluate new iterations of current methods as they become available.

Citing Articles

Sequence-based engineering of pH-sensitive antibodies for tumor targeting or endosomal recycling applications.

Wei W, Sulea T MAbs. 2024; 16(1):2404064.

PMID: 39289783 PMC: 11409498. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2404064.


Biallelic variants in SNUPN cause a limb girdle muscular dystrophy with myofibrillar-like features.

Iruzubieta P, Damborenea A, Ioghen M, Bajew S, Fernandez-Torron R, Topf A Brain. 2024; 147(8):2867-2883.

PMID: 38366623 PMC: 11292911. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae046.


The Application of MD Simulation to Lead Identification, Vaccine Design, and Structural Studies in Combat against Leishmaniasis - A Review.

Vijayakumar S, Laxman Kumar L, Borkotoky S, Murali A Mini Rev Med Chem. 2023; 24(11):1089-1111.

PMID: 37680156 DOI: 10.2174/1389557523666230901105231.


Molecular docking in organic, inorganic, and hybrid systems: a tutorial review.

Mohanty M, Mohanty P Monatsh Chem. 2023; :1-25.

PMID: 37361694 PMC: 10243279. DOI: 10.1007/s00706-023-03076-1.


Solvated interaction energy: from small-molecule to antibody drug design.

Purisima E, Corbeil C, Gaudreault F, Wei W, Deprez C, Sulea T Front Mol Biosci. 2023; 10:1210576.

PMID: 37351549 PMC: 10282643. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1210576.


References
1.
Smith C, Kortemme T . Predicting the tolerated sequences for proteins and protein interfaces using RosettaBackrub flexible backbone design. PLoS One. 2011; 6(7):e20451. PMC: 3138746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020451. View

2.
Ollikainen N, Kortemme T . Computational protein design quantifies structural constraints on amino acid covariation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(11):e1003313. PMC: 3828131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003313. View

3.
Smith C, Kortemme T . Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol. 2008; 380(4):742-56. PMC: 2603262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.023. View

4.
Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z . Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins. 2010; 78(15):3111-4. PMC: 2958056. DOI: 10.1002/prot.22830. View

5.
Dunn S, Wahl L, Gloor G . Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics. 2007; 24(3):333-40. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm604. View