» Articles » PMID: 29357357

What Drives the Perceptual Change Resulting from Speech Motor Adaptation? Evaluation of Hypotheses in a Bayesian Modeling Framework

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Jan 23
PMID 29357357
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Shifts in perceptual boundaries resulting from speech motor learning induced by perturbations of the auditory feedback were taken as evidence for the involvement of motor functions in auditory speech perception. Beyond this general statement, the precise mechanisms underlying this involvement are not yet fully understood. In this paper we propose a quantitative evaluation of some hypotheses concerning the motor and auditory updates that could result from motor learning, in the context of various assumptions about the roles of the auditory and somatosensory pathways in speech perception. This analysis was made possible thanks to the use of a Bayesian model that implements these hypotheses by expressing the relationships between speech production and speech perception in a joint probability distribution. The evaluation focuses on how the hypotheses can (1) predict the location of perceptual boundary shifts once the perturbation has been removed, (2) account for the magnitude of the compensation in presence of the perturbation, and (3) describe the correlation between these two behavioral characteristics. Experimental findings about changes in speech perception following adaptation to auditory feedback perturbations serve as reference. Simulations suggest that they are compatible with a framework in which motor adaptation updates both the auditory-motor internal model and the auditory characterization of the perturbed phoneme, and where perception involves both auditory and somatosensory pathways.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.

Kim K, Gaines J, Parrell B, Ramanarayanan V, Nagarajan S, Houde J PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(7):e1011244.

PMID: 37506120 PMC: 10434967. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011244.


Correlation between the effect of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception and speech production performance.

Ashokumar M, Guichet C, Schwartz J, Ito T Audit Percept Cogn. 2023; 6(1-2):97-107.

PMID: 37260602 PMC: 10229140. DOI: 10.1080/25742442.2022.2134674.


How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.

Floegel M, Kasper J, Perrier P, Kell C Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023; 24(5):313-329.

PMID: 36997716 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-023-00691-z.


Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.

Nault D, Mitsuya T, Purcell D, Munhall K Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:905365.

PMID: 36092651 PMC: 9453207. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.905365.


Integrating prediction errors at two time scales permits rapid recalibration of speech sound categories.

Olasagasti I, Giraud A Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32223894 PMC: 7217692. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.44516.


References
1.
Houde J, Jordan M . Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45(2):295-310. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/023). View

2.
Rauschecker J, Scott S . Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(6):718-24. PMC: 2846110. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2331. View

3.
Hashimoto Y, Sakai K . Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003; 20(1):22-8. PMC: 6871912. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10119. View

4.
Schuerman W, Meyer A, McQueen J . Mapping the Speech Code: Cortical Responses Linking the Perception and Production of Vowels. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:161. PMC: 5383703. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00161. View

5.
Zheng Z, Munhall K, Johnsrude I . Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one's own voice during speech production. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(8):1770-81. PMC: 2862116. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21324. View