» Articles » PMID: 12953303

Brain Activations During Conscious Self-monitoring of Speech Production with Delayed Auditory Feedback: an FMRI Study

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Sep 4
PMID 12953303
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When a speaker's voice returns to one's own ears with a 200-ms delay, the delay causes the speaker to speak less fluently. This phenomenon is called a delayed auditory feedback (DAF) effect. To investigate neural mechanisms of speech processing through the DAF effect, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, in which we designed a paradigm to explore the conscious overt-speech processing and the automatic overt-speech processing separately, while reducing articulatory motion artifacts. The subjects were instructed to (1) read aloud visually presented sentences under real-time auditory feedback (NORMAL), (2) read aloud rapidly under real-time auditory feedback (FAST), (3) read aloud slowly under real-time auditory feedback (SLOW), and (4) read aloud under DAF (DELAY). In the contrasts of DELAY-NORMAL, DELAY-FAST, and DELAY-SLOW, the bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG), the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), and the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) showed significant activation. Moreover, we found that the STG activation was correlated with the degree of DAF effect for all subjects. Because the temporo-parietal regions did not show significant activation in the comparisons among NORMAL, FAST, and SLOW conditions, we can exclude the possibility that its activation is due to speech rates or enhanced attention to altered speech sounds. These results suggest that the temporo-parietal regions function as a conscious self-monitoring system to support an automatic speech production system.

Citing Articles

Structural and functional brain alterations in laryngeal dystonia: A coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Kshatriya N, Battistella G, Simonyan K Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(14):e70000.

PMID: 39305101 PMC: 11415616. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70000.


Speech-induced suppression and vocal feedback sensitivity in human cortex.

Ozker M, Yu L, Dugan P, Doyle W, Friedman D, Devinsky O Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39255194 PMC: 11386952. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94198.


Robustness and adaptability of sensorimotor skills in expert piano performance.

Yasuhara M, Uehara K, Oku T, Shiotani S, Nambu I, Furuya S iScience. 2024; 27(8):110400.

PMID: 39156646 PMC: 11326920. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110400.


The neural network of sensory attenuation: A neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Gu J, Buidze T, Zhao K, Glascher J, Fu X Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):31-51.

PMID: 38954157 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02532-1.


Speech-induced suppression and vocal feedback sensitivity in human cortex.

Ozker M, Yu L, Dugan P, Doyle W, Friedman D, Devinsky O bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38370843 PMC: 10871232. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.08.570736.


References
1.
Chapin C, Blumstein S, Meissner B, Boller F . Speech production mechanisms in aphasia: a delayed auditory feedback study. Brain Lang. 1981; 14(1):106-13. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90068-7. View

2.
Hirano S, Kojima H, Naito Y, Honjo I, Kamoto Y, Okazawa H . Cortical processing mechanism for vocalization with auditory verbal feedback. Neuroreport. 1997; 8(9-10):2379-82. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199707070-00055. View

3.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View

4.
Yates A . Delayed auditory feedback. Psychol Bull. 1963; 60:213-32. DOI: 10.1037/h0044155. View

5.
Stuart A, Kalinowski J, Rastatter M, Lynch K . Effect of delayed auditory feedback on normal speakers at two speech rates. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 111(5 Pt 1):2237-41. DOI: 10.1121/1.1466868. View