» Articles » PMID: 28464681

Sensorimotor Adaptation Affects Perceptual Compensation for Coarticulation

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2017 May 4
PMID 28464681
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A given speech sound will be realized differently depending on the context in which it is produced. Listeners have been found to compensate perceptually for these coarticulatory effects, yet it is unclear to what extent this effect depends on actual production experience. In this study, whether changes in motor-to-sound mappings induced by adaptation to altered auditory feedback can affect perceptual compensation for coarticulation is investigated. Specifically, whether altering how the vowel [i] is produced can affect the categorization of a stimulus continuum between an alveolar and a palatal fricative whose interpretation is dependent on vocalic context is tested. It was found that participants could be sorted into three groups based on whether they tended to oppose the direction of the shifted auditory feedback, to follow it, or a mixture of the two, and that these articulatory responses, not the shifted feedback the participants heard, correlated with changes in perception. These results indicate that sensorimotor adaptation to altered feedback can affect the perception of unaltered yet coarticulatorily-dependent speech sounds, suggesting a modulatory role of sensorimotor experience on speech perception.

Citing Articles

Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction.

Jacobs C, Loucks T, Watson D, Dell G Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022; 35(4):485-497.

PMID: 35992578 PMC: 9390968. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051.


Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Kim K, Max L Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 53(9):3093-3108.

PMID: 33675539 PMC: 8259784. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15175.


Sensorimotor adaptation of speech depends on the direction of auditory feedback alteration.

Kothare H, Raharjo I, Ramanarayanan V, Ranasinghe K, Parrell B, Johnson K J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148(6):3682.

PMID: 33379892 PMC: 7738200. DOI: 10.1121/10.0002876.


A Simple 3-Parameter Model for Examining Adaptation in Speech and Voice Production.

Kearney E, Nieto-Castanon A, Weerathunge H, Falsini R, Daliri A, Abur D Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2995.

PMID: 32038381 PMC: 6985569. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02995.


Recalibration of auditory perception of speech due to orofacial somatosensory inputs during speech motor adaptation.

Ohashi H, Ito T J Neurophysiol. 2019; 122(5):2076-2084.

PMID: 31509469 PMC: 6879949. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00028.2019.


References
1.
Houde J, Jordan M . Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45(2):295-310. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/023). View

2.
Samuel A, Kraljic T . Perceptual learning for speech. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009; 71(6):1207-18. DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1207. View

3.
McQueen J . The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991; 17(2):433-43. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.2.433. View

4.
Cai S, Ghosh S, Guenther F, Perkell J . Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128(4):2033-48. PMC: 2981117. DOI: 10.1121/1.3479539. View

5.
Purcell D, Munhall K . Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 120(2):966-77. DOI: 10.1121/1.2217714. View