» Articles » PMID: 28952584

Optimal Signal Quality Index for Photoplethysmogram Signals

Overview
Date 2017 Sep 28
PMID 28952584
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A photoplethysmogram (PPG) is a noninvasive circulatory signal related to the pulsatile volume of blood in tissue and is typically collected by pulse oximeters. PPG signals collected via mobile devices are prone to artifacts that negatively impact measurement accuracy, which can lead to a significant number of misleading diagnoses. Given the rapidly increased use of mobile devices to collect PPG signals, developing an optimal signal quality index (SQI) is essential to classify the signal quality from these devices. Eight SQIs were developed and tested based on: perfusion, kurtosis, skewness, relative power, non-stationarity, zero crossing, entropy, and the matching of systolic wave detectors. Two independent annotators annotated all PPG data (106 recordings, 60 s each) and a third expert conducted the adjudication of differences. The independent annotators labeled each PPG signal with one of the following labels: excellent, acceptable or unfit for diagnosis. All indices were compared using Mahalanobis distance, linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and support vector machine with leave-one-out cross-validation. The skewness index outperformed the other seven indices in differentiating between excellent PPG and acceptable, acceptable combined with unfit, and unfit recordings, with overall F 1 scores of 86.0%, 87.2%, and 79.1%, respectively.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Applied to Reference Signal-Less Detection of Motion Artifacts in Photoplethysmographic Signals: A Review.

Arguello-Prada E, Castillo Garcia J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39598970 PMC: 11598458. DOI: 10.3390/s24227193.


Accuracy enhancement of metabolic index-based blood glucose estimation with a screening process for low-quality data.

Nakazawa T, Morishita K, Ienaka A, Fujii T, Ito M, Matsushita F J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(10):107001.

PMID: 39464244 PMC: 11503645. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.10.107001.


Detecting cardiac states with wearable photoplethysmograms and implications for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest detection.

Khalili M, Lingawi S, Hutton J, Fordyce C, Christenson J, Shadgan B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23185.

PMID: 39369015 PMC: 11455951. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74117-w.


Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices: Understanding Heterogeneity in Design and Evaluation.

Cheung M, Sabharwal A, Cote G, Veeraraghavan A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 71(12):3569-3592.

PMID: 39106139 PMC: 11799359. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3434344.


Quality-Aware Signal Processing Mechanism of PPG Signal for Long-Term Heart Rate Monitoring.

Beh W, Yang Y, Wu A Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).

PMID: 38931686 PMC: 11207506. DOI: 10.3390/s24123901.


References
1.
Orphanidou C, Bonnici T, Charlton P, Clifton D, Vallance D, Tarassenko L . Signal-quality indices for the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram: derivation and applications to wireless monitoring. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014; 19(3):832-8. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2338351. View

2.
Clifford G, Behar J, Li Q, Rezek I . Signal quality indices and data fusion for determining clinical acceptability of electrocardiograms. Physiol Meas. 2012; 33(9):1419-33. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/9/1419. View

3.
Elgendi M . Detection of c, d, and e waves in the acceleration photoplethysmogram. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014; 117(2):125-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.001. View

4.
Elgendi M . Standard terminologies for photoplethysmogram signals. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012; 8(3):215-9. PMC: 3465827. DOI: 10.2174/157340312803217184. View

5.
Krishnan R, Natarajan B, Warren S . Two-stage approach for detection and reduction of motion artifacts in photoplethysmographic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 57(8):1867-76. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2039568. View