» Articles » PMID: 39106139

Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices: Understanding Heterogeneity in Design and Evaluation

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Rapid advances in cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring have the potential to radically transform clinical care for cardiovascular health. However, due to the large heterogeneity in device design and evaluation, it is difficult to critically and quantitatively evaluate research progress. In this two-part manuscript, we provide a principled way of describing and accounting for heterogeneity in device and study design.

Methods: We first provide an overview of foundational elements and design principles of three critical aspects: 1) sensors and systems, 2) pre-processing and feature extraction, and 3) BP estimation algorithms. Then, we critically analyze the state-of-the-art methods via a systematic review.

Results: First, we find large heterogeneity in study designs, making fair comparisons extremely challenging. Moreover, many study designs have data leakage and are underpowered. We suggest a first open-contribution BP estimation benchmark for standardization. Next, we observe that BP distribution in the study sample and the time between calibration and test in emerging personalized devices confound BP estimation error. We suggest accounting for these using a convenient metric coined "explained deviation". Finally, we complement this manuscript with a website, https://wearablebp.github.io, containing a bibliography, meta-analysis results, datasets, and benchmarks, providing a timely plaWorm to understand state-of-the-art devices.

Conclusion: There is large heterogeneity in device and study design, which should be carefully accounted for when designing, comparing, and contrasting studies.

Significance: Our findings will allow readers to parse out the heterogeneous literature and move toward promising directions for safer and more reliable devices in clinical practice and beyond.

References
1.
Jeong D, Lim K . Combined deep CNN-LSTM network-based multitasking learning architecture for noninvasive continuous blood pressure estimation using difference in ECG-PPG features. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):13539. PMC: 8242087. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92997-0. View

2.
Kumar M, Veeraraghavan A, Sabharwal A . DistancePPG: Robust non-contact vital signs monitoring using a camera. Biomed Opt Express. 2015; 6(5):1565-88. PMC: 4467696. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.6.001565. View

3.
Liu Z, Liu J, Wen B, He Q, Li Y, Miao F . Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Using Pressure Pulse Wave Signals. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(12). PMC: 6308537. DOI: 10.3390/s18124227. View

4.
Giltvedt J, Sira A, Helme P . Pulsed multifrequency photoplethysmograph. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984; 22(3):212-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02442745. View

5.
Chandrasekhar A, Yavarimanesh M, Natarajan K, Hahn J, Mukkamala R . PPG Sensor Contact Pressure Should Be Taken Into Account for Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Measurement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020; 67(11):3134-3140. PMC: 8856571. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2976989. View