» Articles » PMID: 28659298

Nutritional Metabolomics and Breast Cancer Risk in a Prospective Study

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Jun 30
PMID 28659298
Citations 95
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The epidemiologic evidence for associations between dietary factors and breast cancer is weak and etiologic mechanisms are often unclear. Exploring the role of dietary biomarkers with metabolomics can potentially facilitate objective dietary characterization, mitigate errors related to self-reported diet, agnostically test metabolic pathways, and identify mechanistic mediators. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations of diet-related metabolites with the risk of breast cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. We examined prediagnostic serum concentrations of diet-related metabolites in a nested case-control study in 621 postmenopausal invasive breast cancer cases and 621 matched controls in the multicenter PLCO cohort. We calculated partial Pearson correlations between 617 metabolites and 55 foods, food groups, and vitamin supplements on the basis of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and derived from a 137-item self-administered food-frequency questionnaire. Diet-related metabolites (correlation < 1.47 × 10) were evaluated in breast cancer analyses. ORs for the 90th compared with the 10th percentile were calculated by using conditional logistic regression, with body mass index, physical inactivity, other breast cancer risk factors, and caloric intake controlled for (false discovery rate <0.2). Of 113 diet-related metabolites, 3 were associated with overall breast cancer risk (621 cases): caprate (10:0), a saturated fatty acid (OR: 1.77; 95% CI = 1.28, 2.43); γ-carboxyethyl hydrochroman (γ-CEHC), a vitamin E (γ-tocopherol) derivative (OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.28); and 4-androsten-3β,17β-diol-monosulfate (1), an androgen (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.16). Nineteen metabolites were significantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER) breast cancer (418 cases): 12 alcohol-associated metabolites, including 7 androgens and α-hydroxyisovalerate (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.50, 3.32); 3 vitamin E (tocopherol) derivatives (e.g., γ-CEHC; OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.70); butter-associated caprate (10:0) (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.67); and fried food-associated 2-hydroxyoctanoate (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.07). No metabolites were significantly associated with ER-negative breast cancer (144 cases). Prediagnostic serum concentrations of metabolites related to alcohol, vitamin E, and animal fats were moderately strongly associated with ER breast cancer risk. Our findings show how nutritional metabolomics might identify diet-related exposures that modulate cancer risk. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00339495.

Citing Articles

Dietary factors associated with breast cancer among women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Mekonen H, Negesse A, Endalifer M, Molla G, Aneley Z Front Nutr. 2025; 12:1499634.

PMID: 40034736 PMC: 11872731. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1499634.


Causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and lung cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis.

Yu X, Fu B, Sun T, Sun X Front Genet. 2024; 15:1449881.

PMID: 39655224 PMC: 11625780. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1449881.


Diet Quality and Dietary Intake in Breast Cancer Survivors Suffering from Chronic Pain: An Explorative Case-Control Study.

Yilmaz S, Elma O, Nijs J, Clarys P, Coppieters I, Deliens T Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599630 PMC: 11597644. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223844.


Translational Algorithms for Technological Dietary Quality Assessment Integrating Nutrimetabolic Data with Machine Learning Methods.

de la O V, Fernandez-Cruz E, Matia Matin P, Larrad-Sainz A, Espadas Gil J, Barabash A Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599604 PMC: 11597732. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223817.


Plasma metabolomics profiles and breast cancer risk.

Wu H, Lai Y, Liao Y, Deyssenroth M, Miller G, Santella R Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):141.

PMID: 39385226 PMC: 11463119. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01896-5.


References
1.
Key J, Hodgson S, Omar R, Jensen T, Thompson S, Boobis A . Meta-analysis of studies of alcohol and breast cancer with consideration of the methodological issues. Cancer Causes Control. 2006; 17(6):759-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-006-0011-0. View

2.
Durrleman S, Simon R . Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med. 1989; 8(5):551-61. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080504. View

3.
OSullivan A, Gibney M, Brennan L . Dietary intake patterns are reflected in metabolomic profiles: potential role in dietary assessment studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 93(2):314-21. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.000950. View

4.
Troche J, Mayne S, Freedman N, Shebl F, Guertin K, Cross A . Alcohol Consumption-Related Metabolites in Relation to Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma: Two Case-Control Studies Using Serum Biomarkers. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150962. PMC: 4788441. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150962. View

5.
Bingham S, Day N . Commentary: fat and breast cancer: time to re-evaluate both methods and results?. Int J Epidemiol. 2006; 35(4):1022-4. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl142. View