» Articles » PMID: 28637838

Experimental Species Removals Impact the Architecture of Pollination Networks

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jun 23
PMID 28637838
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutualistic networks are key for the creation and maintenance of biodiversity, yet are threatened by global environmental change. Most simulation models assume that network structure remains static after species losses, despite theoretical and empirical reasons to expect dynamic responses. We assessed the effects of experimental single bumblebee species removals on the structure of entire flower visitation networks. We hypothesized that network structure would change following processes linking interspecific competition with dietary niche breadth. We found that single pollinator species losses impact pollination network structure: resource complementarity decreased, while resource overlap increased. Despite marginally increased connectance, fewer plant species were visited after species removals. These changes may have negative functional impacts, as complementarity is important for maintaining biodiversity-ecological functioning relationships and visitation of rare plant species is critical for maintaining diverse plant communities.

Citing Articles

Pollen nutrition structures bee and plant community interactions.

Vaudo A, Dyer L, Leonard A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(3):e2317228120.

PMID: 38190523 PMC: 10801918. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2317228120.


Response of pollinator taxa to fire is consistent with historic fire regimes in the Sierra Nevada and mediated through floral richness.

Tarbill G, White A, Sollmann R Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(12):e10761.

PMID: 38107425 PMC: 10721959. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10761.


Manipulating network connectance by altering plant attractiveness.

Russo L, Stout J PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16319.

PMID: 38025756 PMC: 10640842. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16319.


Recent and future declines of a historically widespread pollinator linked to climate, land cover, and pesticides.

Janousek W, Douglas M, Cannings S, Clement M, Delphia C, Everett J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(5):e2211223120.

PMID: 36689649 PMC: 9945941. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211223120.


Plant-pollinator interaction niche broadens in response to severe drought perturbations.

Endres K, Morozumi C, Loy X, Briggs H, CaraDonna P, Iler A Oecologia. 2021; 197(3):577-588.

PMID: 34546496 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-05036-0.


References
1.
Valdovinos F, Brosi B, Briggs H, Moisset de Espanes P, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Martinez N . Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability. Ecol Lett. 2016; 19(10):1277-86. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12664. View

2.
Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Hayes R, Whalley M, Memmott J . The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol Lett. 2007; 10(7):539-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x. View

3.
Brosi B . Pollinator specialization: from the individual to the community. New Phytol. 2016; 210(4):1190-4. DOI: 10.1111/nph.13951. View

4.
Memmott J . Food webs: a ladder for picking strawberries or a practical tool for practical problems?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1524):1693-9. PMC: 2685425. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0255. View

5.
Memmott J, Waser N, Price M . Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1557):2605-11. PMC: 1691904. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909. View