» Articles » PMID: 20164100

Ecological Release from Interspecific Competition Leads to Decoupled Changes in Population and Individual Niche Width

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Feb 19
PMID 20164100
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A species's niche width reflects a balance between the diversifying effects of intraspecific competition and the constraining effects of interspecific competition. This balance shifts when a species from a competitive environment invades a depauperate habitat where interspecific competition is reduced. The resulting ecological release permits population niche expansion, via increased individual niche widths and/or increased among-individual variation. We report an experimental test of the theory of ecological release in three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We factorially manipulated the presence or absence of two interspecific competitors: juvenile cut-throat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) and prickly sculpin (Cottus asper). Consistent with the classic niche variation hypothesis, release from trout competition increased stickleback population niche width via increased among-individual variation, while individual niche widths remained unchanged. In contrast, release from sculpin competition had no effect on population niche width, because increased individual niche widths were offset by decreased between-individual variation. Our results confirm that ecological release from interspecific competition can lead to increases in niche width, and that these changes can occur on behavioural time scales. Importantly, we find that changes in population niche width are decoupled from changes in the niche widths of individuals within the population.

Citing Articles

Dietary specialization among individual squid: using as a case and meta-analysis for other squid species.

Lin D, Zang N, Song W, Punt A, Gong Y, Li G Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20242591.

PMID: 40041962 PMC: 11881021. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2591.


Ecological Drivers of Molt-Breeding Overlap, an Unusual Life-History Strategy of Small-Island Birds?.

De Ruyck C, Koper N Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(1):e70607.

PMID: 39830705 PMC: 11738649. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70607.


Suppression of Aedes aegypti may not affect sympatric Aedes albopictus populations: findings from two years of entomological surveillance in Singapore.

Wong W, Tan C, Verkaik M, Ng L, Hoffmann A, Chong C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2253.

PMID: 39824916 PMC: 11742399. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86139-z.


Sky High or Grounded: Nest Site Selection of Herons and Egrets in a Mixed-Species Colony.

Samraoui F, Nedjah R, Boucheker A, El-Serehy H, Samraoui B Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(1):e70761.

PMID: 39748809 PMC: 11693640. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70761.


Contrasting responses of soil bacterial and fungal networks to photovoltaic power station.

Li T, Lu L, Kang Z, Li H, Wu J, Du W Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1494681.

PMID: 39723145 PMC: 11669257. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1494681.


References
1.
Trewby I, Wilson G, Delahay R, Walker N, Young R, Davison J . Experimental evidence of competitive release in sympatric carnivores. Biol Lett. 2007; 4(2):170-2. PMC: 2429918. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0516. View

2.
Persson L . Optimal foraging: the difficulty of exploiting different feeding strategies simultaneously. Oecologia. 2017; 67(3):338-341. DOI: 10.1007/BF00384938. View

3.
Costa G, Mesquita D, Colli G, Vitt L . Niche expansion and the niche variation hypothesis: does the degree of individual variation increase in depauperate assemblages?. Am Nat. 2008; 172(6):868-77. DOI: 10.1086/592998. View

4.
Lister B . THE NATURE OF NICHE EXPANSION IN WEST INDIAN ANOLIS LIZARDS II: EVOLUTIONARY COMPONENTS. Evolution. 2017; 30(4):677-692. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00948.x. View

5.
Bolnick D . Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution. 2004; 58(3):608-18. View