» Articles » PMID: 19396144

The Architecture of Mutualistic Networks Minimizes Competition and Increases Biodiversity

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Apr 28
PMID 19396144
Citations 270
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The main theories of biodiversity either neglect species interactions or assume that species interact randomly with each other. However, recent empirical work has revealed that ecological networks are highly structured, and the lack of a theory that takes into account the structure of interactions precludes further assessment of the implications of such network patterns for biodiversity. Here we use a combination of analytical and empirical approaches to quantify the influence of network architecture on the number of coexisting species. As a case study we consider mutualistic networks between plants and their animal pollinators or seed dispersers. These networks have been found to be highly nested, with the more specialist species interacting only with proper subsets of the species that interact with the more generalist. We show that nestedness reduces effective interspecific competition and enhances the number of coexisting species. Furthermore, we show that a nested network will naturally emerge if new species are more likely to enter the community where they have minimal competitive load. Nested networks seem to occur in many biological and social contexts, suggesting that our results are relevant in a wide range of fields.

Citing Articles

Plant interaction traits determine the biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria in soil.

Lewe N, Keyzers R, Tylianakis J, Deslippe J Ecology. 2025; 106(2):e70011.

PMID: 40000386 PMC: 11860738. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.70011.


Dispersal promotes stability and persistence of exploited yeast mutualisms.

Liu C, Vidal M ISME J. 2025; 19(1).

PMID: 39787040 PMC: 11778857. DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wraf003.


Increase of niche filling with increase of host richness for plant-infecting mastreviruses.

Ben Chehida S, Bunwaree H, Hoareau M, Moubset O, Julian C, Blondin L Virus Evol. 2024; 10(1):veae107.

PMID: 39717705 PMC: 11665825. DOI: 10.1093/ve/veae107.


The simpliciality of higher-order networks.

Landry N, Young J, Eikmeier N EPJ Data Sci. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39677596 PMC: 11643508. DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00458-1.


Floral and pollinator functional diversity mediate network structure along an elevational gradient.

Aguirre L, Junker R Alp Bot. 2024; 134(2):193-206.

PMID: 39619637 PMC: 11607024. DOI: 10.1007/s00035-024-00308-w.


References
1.
Lieberman E, Hauert C, Nowak M . Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature. 2005; 433(7023):312-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature03204. View

2.
Holland J, Okuyama T, DeAngelis D . Comment on "Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance". Science. 2006; 313(5795):1887. DOI: 10.1126/science.1129547. View

3.
Pachepsky E, Taylor T, Jones S . Mutualism promotes diversity and stability in a simple artificial ecosystem. Artif Life. 2002; 8(1):5-24. DOI: 10.1162/106454602753694747. View

4.
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen J . Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science. 2006; 312(5772):431-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1123412. View

5.
Memmott J, Waser N, Price M . Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1557):2605-11. PMC: 1691904. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909. View