» Articles » PMID: 28535128

Low- and High-LET Ionizing Radiation Induces Delayed Homologous Recombination That Persists for Two Weeks Before Resolving

Overview
Journal Radiat Res
Specialties Genetics
Radiology
Date 2017 May 24
PMID 28535128
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells and dysregulation or defects in DNA repair pathways cause genome instability and are linked to inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Ionizing radiation can cause immediate effects such as mutation or cell death, observed within hours or a few days after irradiation. Ionizing radiation also induces delayed effects many cell generations after irradiation. Delayed effects include hypermutation, hyper-homologous recombination, chromosome instability and reduced clonogenic survival (delayed death). Delayed hyperrecombination (DHR) is mechanistically distinct from delayed chromosomal instability and delayed death. Using a green fluorescent protein (GFP) direct repeat homologous recombination system, time-lapse microscopy and colony-based assays, we demonstrate that DHR increases several-fold in response to low-LET X rays and high-LET carbon-ion radiation. Time-lapse analyses of DHR revealed two classes of recombinants not detected in colony-based assays, including cells that recombined and then senesced or died. With both low- and high-LET radiation, DHR was evident during the first two weeks postirradiation, but resolved to background levels during the third week. The results indicate that the risk of radiation-induced genome destabilization via DHR is time limited, and suggest that there is little or no additional risk of radiation-induced genome instability mediated by DHR with high-LET radiation compared to low-LET radiation.

Citing Articles

Defective homologous recombination and genomic instability predict increased responsiveness to carbon ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Sishc B, Saha J, Alves E, Ding L, Lu H, Wang S NPJ Precis Oncol. 2025; 9(1):20.

PMID: 39824957 PMC: 11742413. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-00800-4.


Cosmic Ionizing Radiation: A DNA Damaging Agent That May Underly Excess Cancer in Flight Crews.

Toprani S, Scheibler C, Mordukhovich I, McNeely E, Nagel Z Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39062911 PMC: 11277465. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147670.


Comparison of the Medical Uses and Cellular Effects of High and Low Linear Energy Transfer Radiation.

Russ E, Davis C, Slaven J, Bradfield D, Selwyn R, Day R Toxics. 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36287908 PMC: 9609561. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100628.


Roles of homologous recombination in response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Nickoloff J, Sharma N, Allen C, Taylor L, Allen S, Jaiswal A Int J Radiat Biol. 2021; 99(6):903-914.

PMID: 34283012 PMC: 9629169. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1956001.


Replication stress and FOXM1 drive radiation induced genomic instability and cell transformation.

Li Z, Yu D, Doetsch P, Werner E PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0235998.

PMID: 33253193 PMC: 7703902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235998.


References
1.
Durant S, Nickoloff J . Good timing in the cell cycle for precise DNA repair by BRCA1. Cell Cycle. 2005; 4(9):1216-22. DOI: 10.4161/cc.4.9.2027. View

2.
Limoli C, Kaplan M, Phillips J, Adair G, Morgan W . Differential induction of chromosomal instability by DNA strand-breaking agents. Cancer Res. 1997; 57(18):4048-56. View

3.
Bertrand P, Lambert S, Joubert C, Lopez B . Overexpression of mammalian Rad51 does not stimulate tumorigenesis while a dominant-negative Rad51 affects centrosome fragmentation, ploidy and stimulates tumorigenesis, in p53-defective CHO cells. Oncogene. 2003; 22(48):7587-92. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206998. View

4.
Huang L, Grim S, Smith L, Kim P, Nickoloff J, Goloubeva O . Ionizing radiation induces delayed hyperrecombination in Mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(11):5060-8. PMC: 416413. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.5060-5068.2004. View

5.
Liber H, Idate R, Warner C, Bailey S . Radiation quality and mutagenesis in human lymphoblastoid cells. Radiat Res. 2014; 182(4):390-5. DOI: 10.1667/RR13817.1. View