» Articles » PMID: 36287908

Comparison of the Medical Uses and Cellular Effects of High and Low Linear Energy Transfer Radiation

Overview
Journal Toxics
Date 2022 Oct 26
PMID 36287908
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exposure to ionizing radiation can occur during medical treatments, from naturally occurring sources in the environment, or as the result of a nuclear accident or thermonuclear war. The severity of cellular damage from ionizing radiation exposure is dependent upon a number of factors including the absorbed radiation dose of the exposure (energy absorbed per unit mass of the exposure), dose rate, area and volume of tissue exposed, type of radiation (e.g., X-rays, high-energy gamma rays, protons, or neutrons) and linear energy transfer. While the dose, the dose rate, and dose distribution in tissue are aspects of a radiation exposure that can be varied experimentally or in medical treatments, the LET and eV are inherent characteristics of the type of radiation. High-LET radiation deposits a higher concentration of energy in a shorter distance when traversing tissue compared with low-LET radiation. The different biological effects of high and low LET with similar energies have been documented in vivo in animal models and in cultured cells. High-LET results in intense macromolecular damage and more cell death. Findings indicate that while both low- and high-LET radiation activate non-homologous end-joining DNA repair activity, efficient repair of high-LET radiation requires the homologous recombination repair pathway. Low- and high-LET radiation activate p53 transcription factor activity in most cells, but high LET activates NF-kB transcription factor at lower radiation doses than low-LET radiation. Here we review the development, uses, and current understanding of the cellular effects of low- and high-LET radiation exposure.

Citing Articles

Comparative effectiveness of kilo- and megavoltage energies in low-dose radiotherapy for painful degenerative musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kim A, Kwon J, Kim J, Kim B Strahlenther Onkol. 2024; .

PMID: 39633160 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02329-0.


Preliminary Study on Lutetium-177 and Gold Nanoparticles: Apoptosis and Radiation Enhancement in Hepatic Cancer Cell Line.

Kouri M, Georgopoulos A, Manios G, Maratou E, Spathis A, Chatziioannou S Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(11):12244-12259.

PMID: 39590321 PMC: 11592690. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46110727.


Exploring Extravasation in Cancer Patients.

Pham T, Tsunoyama T Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001371 PMC: 11240416. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132308.


Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) Trigger Cell Death and Senescence in Cancer Cells.

Pantelis P, Theocharous G, Veroutis D, Vagena I, Polyzou A, Thanos D Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(5).

PMID: 38473720 PMC: 10931548. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052473.


A spatial measure-valued model for radiation-induced DNA damage kinetics and repair under protracted irradiation condition.

Cordoni F J Math Biol. 2024; 88(2):21.

PMID: 38285219 PMC: 10824812. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-024-02046-3.


References
1.
Panganiban R, Day R . Inhibition of IGF-1R prevents ionizing radiation-induced primary endothelial cell senescence. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e78589. PMC: 3813482. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078589. View

2.
Bartesaghi S, Radi R . Fundamentals on the biochemistry of peroxynitrite and protein tyrosine nitration. Redox Biol. 2017; 14:618-625. PMC: 5694970. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.09.009. View

3.
Zhang X, Ye C, Sun F, Wei W, Hu B, Wang J . Both Complexity and Location of DNA Damage Contribute to Cellular Senescence Induced by Ionizing Radiation. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155725. PMC: 4871470. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155725. View

4.
Bennardo N, Cheng A, Huang N, Stark J . Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet. 2008; 4(6):e1000110. PMC: 2430616. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000110. View

5.
Yim J, Yun J, Kim J, Lee I, Nam S, Kim C . Phosphoprotein profiles of candidate markers for early cellular responses to low-dose γ-radiation in normal human fibroblast cells. J Radiat Res. 2017; 58(3):329-340. PMC: 5440887. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw126. View