Soft Tissue Artifact Causes Significant Errors in the Calculation of Joint Angles and Range of Motion at the Hip

Overview

Journal Gait Posture

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2017 May 6

PMID 28475981

Citations 31

Authors

Niccolo M Fiorentino

Penny R Atkins

Michael J Kutschke

Justine M Goebel

K Bo Foreman

Andrew E Anderson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Soft tissue movement between reflective skin markers and underlying bone induces errors in gait analysis. These errors are known as soft tissue artifact (STA). Prior studies have not examined how STA affects hip joint angles and range of motion (ROM) during dynamic activities. Herein, we: 1) measured STA of skin markers on the pelvis and thigh during walking, hip abduction and hip rotation, 2) quantified errors in tracking the thigh, pelvis and hip joint angles/ROM, and 3) determined whether model constraints on hip joint degrees of freedom mitigated errors. Eleven asymptomatic young adults were imaged simultaneously with retroreflective skin markers (SM) and dual fluoroscopy (DF), an X-ray technique with sub-millimeter and sub-degree accuracy. STA, defined as the range of SM positions in the DF-measured bone anatomical frame, varied based on marker location, activity and subject. Considering all skin markers and activities, mean STA ranged from 0.3cm to 5.4cm. STA caused the hip joint angle tracked with SM to be 1.9° more extended, 0.6° more adducted, and 5.8° more internally rotated than the hip tracked with DF. ROM was reduced for SM measurements relative to DF, with the largest difference of 21.8° about the internal-external axis during hip rotation. Constraining the model did not consistently reduce angle errors. Our results indicate STA causes substantial errors, particularly for markers tracking the femur and during hip internal-external rotation. This study establishes the need for future research to develop methods minimizing STA of markers on the thigh and pelvis.

Citing Articles

Reducing soft tissue artefacts through projection of markers and microwave imaging: An exploratory study.

Radhakrishnan V, Robinson M, Fiorentino N, Patil S, Pelah A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7679.

PMID: 40044738 PMC: 11883034. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89586-w.

Reliability and validity of a video-based markerless motion capture system in young healthy subjects.

Wang Z, Chen H, Yue L, Zhang J, Sun H Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42597.

PMID: 40040988 PMC: 11876916. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42597.

Reliability of artificial intelligence-driven markerless motion capture in gait analyses of healthy adults.

Schoenwether B, Ripic Z, Nienhuis M, Signorile J, Best T, Eltoukhy M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316119.

PMID: 39841651 PMC: 11753651. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316119.

Sex-Based Differences and Asymmetry in Hip Kinematics During Unilateral Extension From Deep Hip Flexion.

Johnson C, Ruh E, Frankston N, Charles S, McClincy M, Anderst W J Biomech Eng. 2024; 146(12).

PMID: 39262043 PMC: 11500802. DOI: 10.1115/1.4066466.

Gait signature changes with walking speed are similar among able-bodied young adults despite persistent individual-specific differences.

Winner T, Rosenberg M, Berman G, Kesar T, Ting L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19730.

PMID: 39183361 PMC: 11345452. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70787-8.

References

Kainz H, Modenese L, Lloyd D, Maine S, Walsh H, Carty C . Joint kinematic calculation based on clinical direct kinematic versus inverse kinematic gait models. J Biomech. 2016; 49(9):1658-1669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.052. View

Peters A, Galna B, Sangeux M, Morris M, Baker R . Quantification of soft tissue artifact in lower limb human motion analysis: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009; 31(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.004. View

Benoit D, Ramsey D, Lamontagne M, Xu L, Wretenberg P, Renstrom P . Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture. 2005; 24(2):152-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.04.012. View

Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech. 2002; 35(4):543-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00222-6. View

Ludbrook J . Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999; 25(12):1032-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1998.tb02179.x. View

Akbarshahi M, Schache A, Fernandez J, Baker R, Banks S, Pandy M . Non-invasive assessment of soft-tissue artifact and its effect on knee joint kinematics during functional activity. J Biomech. 2010; 43(7):1292-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.002. View

Wren T, Gorton 3rd G, Ounpuu S, Tucker C . Efficacy of clinical gait analysis: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2011; 34(2):149-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.027. View

Grimpampi E, Camomilla V, Cereatti A, de Leva P, Cappozzo A . Metrics for describing soft-tissue artefact and its effect on pose, size, and shape of marker clusters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 61(2):362-7. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2279636. View

Hara R, Sangeux M, Baker R, McGinley J . Quantification of pelvic soft tissue artifact in multiple static positions. Gait Posture. 2013; 39(2):712-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.10.001. View

10.

Bey M, Zauel R, Brock S, Tashman S . Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 2006; 128(4):604-9. PMC: 3072582. DOI: 10.1115/1.2206199. View

11.

Andersen M, Benoit D, Damsgaard M, Ramsey D, Rasmussen J . Do kinematic models reduce the effects of soft tissue artefacts in skin marker-based motion analysis? An in vivo study of knee kinematics. J Biomech. 2009; 43(2):268-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.034. View

12.

Bonci T, Camomilla V, Dumas R, Cheze L, Cappozzo A . A soft tissue artefact model driven by proximal and distal joint kinematics. J Biomech. 2014; 47(10):2354-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.029. View

13.

Duprey S, Cheze L, Dumas R . Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization. J Biomech. 2010; 43(14):2858-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.010. View

14.

Fiorentino N, Kutschke M, Atkins P, Foreman K, Kapron A, Anderson A . Accuracy of Functional and Predictive Methods to Calculate the Hip Joint Center in Young Non-pathologic Asymptomatic Adults with Dual Fluoroscopy as a Reference Standard. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 44(7):2168-80. PMC: 4893978. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1522-1. View

15.

Ku J, Hicks J, Hastie T, Leskovec J, Re C, Delp S . The mobilize center: an NIH big data to knowledge center to advance human movement research and improve mobility. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1120-5. PMC: 4639715. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv071. View

16.

Toogood P, Skalak A, Cooperman D . Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(4):876-85. PMC: 2650061. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0473-3. View

17.

Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert A, Nigg B, Lundberg A, Murphy N . Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech. 1997; 30(7):729-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00001-8. View

18.

Fiorentino N, Atkins P, Kutschke M, Foreman K, Anderson A . In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact. Gait Posture. 2016; 50:246-251. PMC: 5119549. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.011. View

19.

Mantovani G, Lamontagne M . How Different Marker Sets Affect Joint Angles in Inverse Kinematics Framework. J Biomech Eng. 2016; 139(4). DOI: 10.1115/1.4034708. View

20.

Camomilla V, Bonci T, Cappozzo A . Soft tissue displacement over pelvic anatomical landmarks during 3-D hip movements. J Biomech. 2017; 62:14-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.013. View