» Articles » PMID: 38746237

Gait Signature Changes with Walking Speed Are Similar Among Able-bodied Young Adults Despite Persistent Individual-specific Differences

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 May 15
PMID 38746237
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding individuals' distinct movement patterns is crucial for health, rehabilitation, and sports. Recently, we developed a machine learning-based framework to show that "gait signatures" describing the neuromechanical dynamics governing able-bodied and post-stroke gait kinematics remain individual-specific across speeds. However, we only evaluated gait signatures within a limited speed range and number of participants, using only sagittal plane (i.e., 2D) joint angles. Here we characterized changes in gait signatures across a wide range of speeds, from very slow (0.3 m/s) to exceptionally fast (above the walk-to-run transition speed) in 17 able-bodied young adults. We further assessed whether 3D kinematic and/or kinetic (ground reaction forces, joint moments, and powers) data would improve the discrimination of gait signatures. Our study showed that gait signatures remained individual-specific across walking speeds: Notably, 3D kinematic signatures achieved exceptional accuracy (99.8%, confidence interval (CI): 99.1-100%) in classifying individuals, surpassing both 2D kinematics and 3D kinetics. Moreover, participants exhibited consistent, predictable linear changes in their gait signatures across the entire speed range. These changes were associated with participants' preferred walking speeds, balance ability, cadence, and step length. These findings support gait signatures as a tool to characterize individual differences in gait and predict speed-induced changes in gait dynamics.

References
1.
Chen G, Patten C, Kothari D, Zajac F . Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005; 22(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.009. View

2.
Schollhorn W, Nigg B, Stefanyshyn D, Liu W . Identification of individual walking patterns using time discrete and time continuous data sets. Gait Posture. 2002; 15(2):180-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00193-x. View

3.
Leboeuf F, Barre A, Aminian K, Sangeux M . On the accuracy of the Conventional gait Model: Distinction between marker misplacement and soft tissue artefact errors. J Biomech. 2023; 159:111774. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111774. View

4.
Okita Y, Tatematsu N, Nagai K, Nakayama T, Nakamata T, Okamoto T . The effect of walking speed on gait kinematics and kinetics after endoprosthetic knee replacement following bone tumor resection. Gait Posture. 2014; 40(4):622-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.012. View

5.
Troje N . Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. J Vis. 2003; 2(5):371-87. DOI: 10.1167/2.5.2. View